• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查的实施:主要问题有哪些?

Implementation of lung cancer screening: what are the main issues?

作者信息

van der Aalst Carlijn M, Ten Haaf Kevin, de Koning Harry J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1050-1063. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-985.

DOI:10.21037/tlcr-20-985
PMID:33718044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947387/
Abstract

Two large-scale RCTs have shown computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening to be efficacious in reducing lung cancer mortality (8-24% in men, 26-59% in women). However, lung cancer screening implicitly means personalised and risk-based approaches. Health care systems' implementation of personalised screening and prevention is still sparse, and likely to be of variable quality, because of important remaining uncertainties, which have been incompletely addressed or not at all so far. Further optimisation of lung cancer screening programs is expected to reduce harms and maintain or enhance benefit for eligible European citizens, whilst significantly reducing health care costs. Some main uncertainties (e.g., Risk-based eligibility, Risk-based screening intervals, Volume CT screening, Smoking Cessation, Gender and Sex differences, Cost-Effectiveness) are discussed in this review. 4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN (acronym for: Towards INdividually tailored INvitations, screening INtervals and INtegrated co-morbidity reducing strategies in lung cancer screening) is the first multi-centred implementation trial on volume CT lung cancer screening amongst 24,000 males and females, at high risk for developing lung cancer, across five European countries, started in January 2020. Through providing answers to the remaining questions with this trial, many EU citizens will swiftly benefit from this high-quality screening technology, others will face less harms than previously anticipated, and health care costs will be substantially reduced. Implementing a new cancer screening programme is a major task, with many stakeholders and many possible facilitators but also barriers and obstacle.

摘要

两项大规模随机对照试验表明,计算机断层扫描(CT)肺癌筛查在降低肺癌死亡率方面是有效的(男性降低8%-24%,女性降低26%-59%)。然而,肺癌筛查隐含着个性化和基于风险的方法。由于仍存在重要的不确定性,而这些不确定性迄今尚未得到充分解决或根本未得到解决,医疗保健系统对个性化筛查和预防的实施仍然很少,而且质量可能参差不齐。预计进一步优化肺癌筛查项目将减少危害,为符合条件的欧洲公民维持或提高益处,同时显著降低医疗保健成本。本综述讨论了一些主要的不确定性(例如,基于风险的资格、基于风险的筛查间隔、容积CT筛查、戒烟、性别差异、成本效益)。4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN(全称为:肺癌筛查中实现个性化邀请、筛查间隔和综合合并症减少策略)是第一项针对24000名男性和女性进行容积CT肺癌筛查的多中心实施试验,这些人在五个欧洲国家患肺癌的风险很高,该试验于2020年1月开始。通过该试验回答剩余问题,许多欧盟公民将迅速受益于这项高质量的筛查技术,其他人面临的危害将比之前预期的要少,医疗保健成本也将大幅降低。实施一项新的癌症筛查项目是一项重大任务,涉及许多利益相关者以及许多可能的促进因素,但也存在障碍和阻碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/1e1a69b269ae/tlcr-10-02-1050-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/3b78c397c11c/tlcr-10-02-1050-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/2175a38c4aa1/tlcr-10-02-1050-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/1e1a69b269ae/tlcr-10-02-1050-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/3b78c397c11c/tlcr-10-02-1050-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/2175a38c4aa1/tlcr-10-02-1050-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47e/7947387/1e1a69b269ae/tlcr-10-02-1050-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of lung cancer screening: what are the main issues?肺癌筛查的实施:主要问题有哪些?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1050-1063. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-985.
2
3
4
5
Implementing Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Recommendations From an Expert Panel.采用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的实施:专家小组的建议。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e44-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001528. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
6
Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.低剂量计算机断层扫描在高危人群中的肺癌筛查:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(69):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta22690.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer: systematic reviews.计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jan;10(3):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta10030.
8
Projected effectiveness of lung cancer screening and concurrent smoking cessation support in the Netherlands.荷兰肺癌筛查及同时提供戒烟支持的预期效果。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 8;71:102570. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102570. eCollection 2024 May.
9
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.加拿大每两年进行一次肺癌筛查并结合戒烟——结果与成本效益。
Lung Cancer. 2016 Nov;101:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial.芬兰的肺癌筛查:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Jun 11;64:769-774. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43093.
2
Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer.为什么女性在接受肺癌筛查时似乎有更好的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jun;22(6):925-933. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-863OC.
3
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose CT: A Systematic Review.低剂量CT肺癌筛查:一项系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.风险预测模型与美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查资格标准:减少种族差异。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Nov;15(11):1738-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Factors influencing lung cancer screening completion following participation in shared decision-making: A retrospective study in a U.S. academic health system.影响参与共享决策后肺癌筛查完成率的因素:美国学术医疗系统中的回顾性研究。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2020;24:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100198. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
Cureus. 2024 Dec 11;16(12):e75515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75515. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Lung cancer screening: where do we stand?肺癌筛查:我们目前的状况如何?
Breathe (Sheff). 2024 Aug 27;20(2):230190. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0190-2023. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Patient Perspectives on a Patient-Facing Tool for Lung Cancer Screening.患者对肺癌筛查中面向患者的工具的看法。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14143. doi: 10.1111/hex.14143.
6
Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging.巴西肺癌筛查:巴西胸外科学会、巴西胸科协会和巴西放射学和诊断影像学学院的建议。
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Mar 22;50(1):e20230233. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230233. eCollection 2024.
7
Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: What We Have Learned in Two Decades of ITALUNG and What Is Yet to Be Addressed.低剂量CT肺癌筛查:我们在ITALUNG二十年中学到了什么以及仍有待解决的问题
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;13(13):2197. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132197.
8
Prevalence and clinical characteristics of non-malignant CT detected incidental findings in the SUMMIT lung cancer screening cohort.SUMMIT 肺癌筛查队列中 CT 检测到的非恶性偶然发现的患病率和临床特征。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Jun;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001664.
9
Radiation Exposure to Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Should We Be Concerned?肺癌筛查中低剂量 CT 辐射暴露:我们应该担心吗?
Tomography. 2023 Jan 24;9(1):166-177. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010015.
10
Risk Model-Based Lung Cancer Screening : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.基于风险模型的肺癌筛查:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):320-332. doi: 10.7326/M22-2216. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO and LLP) performance in a community-based lung cancer screening programme.
基于社区的肺癌筛查项目中肺癌风险模型(PLCO 和 LLP)性能分析。
Thorax. 2020 Aug;75(8):661-668. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214626. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.风险预测模型与简化选择标准在确定肺癌筛查资格中的比较:基于德国联邦范围调查和发病数据的分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00657-w. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
5
Screening for cardiovascular disease risk using traditional risk factor assessment or coronary artery calcium scoring: the ROBINSCA trial.使用传统风险因素评估或冠状动脉钙评分筛查心血管疾病风险:ROBINSCA 试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 20;21(11):1216-1224. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa168.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.新西兰肺癌低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查项目的成本效益
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jun;144:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
7
The impact of perceived risk, screening eligibility and worry on preference for lung cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey.感知风险、筛查资格及担忧对肺癌筛查偏好的影响:一项横断面调查
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Mar 16;6(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00158-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
Disparities of National Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines in the US Population.美国人群中肺癌筛查指南的差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1136-1142. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa013.
9
Protocol and Rationale for the International Lung Screening Trial.国际肺癌筛查试验的方案和原理。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Apr;17(4):503-512. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201902-102OC.
10
Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Testing Targeted Invitation Materials.肺筛检吸收率试验 (LSUT):随机对照临床试验测试靶向邀请材料。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 15;201(8):965-975. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0946OC.