• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对接受无导线起搏器患者住院结局的影响:一项五类分析。

Impact of body mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients receiving leadless pacemakers: A five-category analysis.

作者信息

Sagoo Rajveer, Sagoo Navraj S, Haider Ali S, Sathyamoorthy Mohanakrishnan

机构信息

College of Science and Engineering, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Oct 1;5(12):883-889. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.017. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.017
PMID:39803626
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11721722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adoption of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) is increasing, yet the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural outcomes remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of BMI on in-hospital outcomes for patients receiving LPM implantation.

METHODS

Data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018-2021 were analyzed for patients older than 18 years who underwent LPM implantation, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Patients were identified using codes and categorized into BMI groups: underweight, normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, pericardial complications, infection/inflammation, removal/revision, and other complications.

RESULTS

The study included 3832 patients who underwent LPM implantation between 2018 and 2021, weighted to represent 19,610 patients, with 3540 having an appropriate BMI designation. Mortality was lower in the obese group (2.3%) compared to the nonobese group (2.7%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259-0.623, = .009). Compared to the normal weight group, those categorized as overweight, obese, and morbidly obese demonstrated a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.432, 95% CI 0.299-0.734, = .009; aOR 0.465, 95% CI 0.238-0.721, <.001; aOR 0.299, 95% CI 0.153-0.586, <.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the existence of the obesity paradox in patients with LPM implantation, where higher BMI categories are associated with improved mortality outcomes, meeting our prespecified primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these observations.

摘要

背景

无导线起搏器(LPM)的应用正在增加,但体重指数(BMI)对手术结果的影响仍未得到充分研究。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨BMI对接受LPM植入患者住院结局的影响。

方法

分析了2018年至2021年国家住院患者样本中年龄大于18岁且接受LPM植入的患者数据,并应用了特定的纳入和排除标准。使用编码识别患者,并将其分为BMI组:体重过轻、正常、超重、肥胖和病态肥胖。评估的主要结局是住院死亡率。次要结局包括输血、心包并发症、感染/炎症、移除/修订和其他并发症。

结果

该研究纳入了2018年至2021年间接受LPM植入的3832例患者,加权后代表19610例患者,其中3540例有合适的BMI分类。肥胖组的死亡率(2.3%)低于非肥胖组(2.7%)(调整后的优势比[aOR]为0.462,95%置信区间[CI]为0.259-0.623,P =.009)。与正常体重组相比,被归类为超重、肥胖和病态肥胖的患者住院死亡率风险较低(aOR分别为0.432,95%CI为0.299-0.734,P =.009;aOR为0.465,95%CI为0.238-0.721,P <.001;aOR为0.299,95%CI为0.153-0.586,P <.001)。

结论

这些发现支持了LPM植入患者中存在肥胖悖论,即较高的BMI类别与改善的死亡率结局相关,达到了我们预先设定的主要终点。需要进一步研究来阐明这些观察结果背后的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04ae/11721722/ffd55d7b176e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04ae/11721722/ffd55d7b176e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04ae/11721722/ffd55d7b176e/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of body mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients receiving leadless pacemakers: A five-category analysis.体重指数对接受无导线起搏器患者住院结局的影响:一项五类分析。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Oct 1;5(12):883-889. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.017. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and complications of leadless pacemaker and traditional transvenous pacemaker implantation.无导线起搏器与传统经静脉起搏器植入的住院期间结局和并发症比较。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad269.
3
Comparison of Body Mass Index (Four Categories) to In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的体重指数(四类)与院内结局的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 1;192:190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.032. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Association of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease with procedural complications and inpatient outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantations across the United States.在美国,无导线起搏器植入术的程序并发症和住院结局与慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病的相关性。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1695-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1816. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States.美国无导线起搏器植入的当代趋势。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;35(7):1351-1359. doi: 10.1111/jce.16295. Epub 2024 May 2.
6
Mortality and amputation outcomes of infrainguinal bypass versus endovascular therapy based on body mass index.基于体重指数的股腘动脉旁路移植术与血管腔内治疗的死亡率和截肢结局
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.013. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
7
Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A real-world analysis from the National Inpatient Sample database.接受无导线起搏器植入术患者中需要干预的心包积液:来自国家住院样本数据库的真实世界分析
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Feb 19;5(4):217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.004. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Can Patient Selection Explain the Obesity Paradox in Orthopaedic Hip Surgery? An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Registry.患者选择能否解释骨科髋关节手术中的肥胖悖论?对 ACS-NSQIP 注册中心的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 May;476(5):964-973. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000218.
9
The impact of body habitus on outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis.体型对颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响:全国住院患者样本分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):36-46. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152562. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
10
Increased body mass index and adjusted mortality in ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒症或脓毒性休克的重症监护病房患者体重指数增加与校正死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 15;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1360-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness and Safety of Leadless Pacemakers: An Updated Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器的有效性和安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):789-799. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02079-6. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
2
Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States.美国无导线起搏器植入的当代趋势。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;35(7):1351-1359. doi: 10.1111/jce.16295. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A real-world analysis from the National Inpatient Sample database.
接受无导线起搏器植入术患者中需要干预的心包积液:来自国家住院样本数据库的真实世界分析
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Feb 19;5(4):217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.004. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Leadless pacemakers at 5-year follow-up: the Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry.5 年随访的无导线起搏器:Micra 经导管起搏系统上市后注册研究。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 7;45(14):1241-1251. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae101.
5
Pericardial effusion in oncological patients: current knowledge and principles of management.肿瘤患者的心包积液:当前认知与管理原则
Cardiooncology. 2024 Feb 16;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40959-024-00207-3.
6
Comparison of Safety of Leadless Pacemakers and Transvenous Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器安全性的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45086. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Comparative assessment of safety with leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers: a systemic review and meta-analysis.无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器安全性的对比评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;66(9):2165-2175. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01550-8. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Rate and nature of complications with leadless transcatheter pacemakers compared with transvenous pacemakers: results from an Italian multicentre large population analysis.与经静脉起搏器相比,无导线经导管起搏器的并发症发生率和类型:来自意大利多中心大人群分析的结果。
Europace. 2023 Feb 8;25(1):112-120. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac112.
9
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.开发和验证用于预测无导线起搏器植入患者发生心包积液风险的评分:使用 Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e019212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019212. Epub 2021 Jun 25.