Sagoo Rajveer, Sagoo Navraj S, Haider Ali S, Sathyamoorthy Mohanakrishnan
College of Science and Engineering, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Oct 1;5(12):883-889. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.017. eCollection 2024 Dec.
The adoption of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) is increasing, yet the impact of body mass index (BMI) on procedural outcomes remains underexplored.
The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of BMI on in-hospital outcomes for patients receiving LPM implantation.
Data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2018-2021 were analyzed for patients older than 18 years who underwent LPM implantation, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Patients were identified using codes and categorized into BMI groups: underweight, normal, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion, pericardial complications, infection/inflammation, removal/revision, and other complications.
The study included 3832 patients who underwent LPM implantation between 2018 and 2021, weighted to represent 19,610 patients, with 3540 having an appropriate BMI designation. Mortality was lower in the obese group (2.3%) compared to the nonobese group (2.7%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.259-0.623, = .009). Compared to the normal weight group, those categorized as overweight, obese, and morbidly obese demonstrated a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.432, 95% CI 0.299-0.734, = .009; aOR 0.465, 95% CI 0.238-0.721, <.001; aOR 0.299, 95% CI 0.153-0.586, <.001, respectively).
These findings support the existence of the obesity paradox in patients with LPM implantation, where higher BMI categories are associated with improved mortality outcomes, meeting our prespecified primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms behind these observations.
无导线起搏器(LPM)的应用正在增加,但体重指数(BMI)对手术结果的影响仍未得到充分研究。
本研究的目的是探讨BMI对接受LPM植入患者住院结局的影响。
分析了2018年至2021年国家住院患者样本中年龄大于18岁且接受LPM植入的患者数据,并应用了特定的纳入和排除标准。使用编码识别患者,并将其分为BMI组:体重过轻、正常、超重、肥胖和病态肥胖。评估的主要结局是住院死亡率。次要结局包括输血、心包并发症、感染/炎症、移除/修订和其他并发症。
该研究纳入了2018年至2021年间接受LPM植入的3832例患者,加权后代表19610例患者,其中3540例有合适的BMI分类。肥胖组的死亡率(2.3%)低于非肥胖组(2.7%)(调整后的优势比[aOR]为0.462,95%置信区间[CI]为0.259-0.623,P =.009)。与正常体重组相比,被归类为超重、肥胖和病态肥胖的患者住院死亡率风险较低(aOR分别为0.432,95%CI为0.299-0.734,P =.009;aOR为0.465,95%CI为0.238-0.721,P <.001;aOR为0.299,95%CI为0.153-0.586,P <.001)。
这些发现支持了LPM植入患者中存在肥胖悖论,即较高的BMI类别与改善的死亡率结局相关,达到了我们预先设定的主要终点。需要进一步研究来阐明这些观察结果背后的机制。