Gopinathan Unni, Peacocke Elizabeth, Abankwah Daniel Nana Yaw, Aryeetey Genevieve C, Glenton Claire, Khisa Peninah N, Koduah Augustina, Ram Ravi, Nonvignon Justice, Nzinga Jacinta, Ottie-Boakye Doris, Pakenham-Walsh Neil M, Tsofa Benjamin, Waithaka Dennis, Lewin Simon
Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Global Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD015810. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015810.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (qualitative). The objectives are as follows: To explore the use of evidence from civil society in national and subnational health policy processes. The specific research questions will include the following. How is evidence from civil society incorporated into health policy processes and what types of evidence are (or are not) incorporated? How do civil society actors perceive and experience the use of their evidence in health policy processes? How do decision-makers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders in health policy processes experience and use civil society evidence, and what factors affect this process? What are civil society actors', healthcare providers', decision-makers' and other stakeholders' views and experiences of how evidence from civil society actors influences inclusiveness, responsiveness and accountability within health policy processes?
这是一项Cochrane系统评价(定性)方案。目标如下:探讨民间社会的证据在国家和国家以下层面卫生政策制定过程中的应用。具体研究问题将包括以下内容。民间社会的证据是如何纳入卫生政策制定过程的,以及哪些类型的证据被(或未被)纳入?民间社会行为体如何看待和体验其证据在卫生政策制定过程中的应用?卫生政策制定过程中的决策者、医疗服务提供者和其他利益相关者如何体验和使用民间社会的证据,以及哪些因素影响这一过程?民间社会行为体、医疗服务提供者、决策者和其他利益相关者对于民间社会行为体的证据如何影响卫生政策制定过程中的包容性、响应性和问责制有何看法和体验?