• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上腹部右上部体腔深度对肝第7段开放及腹腔镜肝切除术的影响

Impact of depth of body cavity at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on open and laparoscopic liver resection of segment 7.

作者信息

Gon Hidetoshi, Komatsu Shohei, Soyama Hirotoshi, Tanaka Motofumi, Kido Masahiro, Fukushima Kenji, Urade Takeshi, So Shinichi, Yoshida Toshihiko, Arai Keisuke, Tsugawa Daisuke, Yanagimoto Hiroaki, Toyama Hirochika, Fukumoto Takumi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University, Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 13;410(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03605-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03605-y
PMID:39804508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11729157/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The impact of body-cavity depth on open (OLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segment 7 remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the influence of body-cavity depth at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on LLR and OLR of segment 7.

METHODS

In total, 101 patients who underwent segment-7 liver resection over 2010-2023 were included. Body-cavity depth was measured from the abdominal-wall surface to the deepest site on the right side of the liver. Patients were categorized into shallow (< 18.4 cm) and deep (≥ 18.4 cm) populations based on median body-cavity depth. We compared surgical outcomes between OLR and LLR in shallow and deep populations after propensity-score adjustments.

RESULTS

In OLR and LLR groups, 27 and 22 patients in the shallow population, respectively, and 26 and 26 patients were included in the deep population, respectively, were included. The OLR group in the deep population had significantly greater blood loss than the corresponding LLR group (difference: 144 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): [50, 238], P = 0.004). Other surgical outcomes, including operative time, were similar between groups. In the shallow population, the OLR group had significantly shorter operative time (difference: - 54 mL, 95% CI: [-101, - 6], P = 0.028) and similar blood loss than the LLR group.

CONCLUSIONS

For segment-7 liver resection, LLR is likely favorable for patients with a deep body cavity, with similar operative time and lower blood loss compared to OLR. Body-cavity depth could be a useful indicator for determining the suitable surgical approach for segment-7 liver resection.

摘要

目的

体腔深度对肝7段开放肝切除术(OLR)和腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们研究了上腹部右侧体腔深度对肝7段LLR和OLR的影响。

方法

总共纳入了2010年至2023年间接受肝7段切除术的101例患者。体腔深度从腹壁表面测量至肝脏右侧最深部位。根据体腔深度中位数,将患者分为浅体腔组(<18.4 cm)和深体腔组(≥18.4 cm)。在进行倾向得分调整后,我们比较了浅体腔组和深体腔组中OLR和LLR的手术结果。

结果

在OLR组和LLR组中,浅体腔组分别有27例和22例患者,深体腔组分别有26例和26例患者。深体腔组的OLR组失血明显多于相应的LLR组(差异:144 mL,95%置信区间(CI):[50, 238],P = 0.004)。包括手术时间在内的其他手术结果在两组之间相似。在浅体腔组中,OLR组的手术时间明显更短(差异:-54 mL,95% CI:[-101, -6],P = 0.028),且与LLR组的失血量相似。

结论

对于肝7段切除术,LLR可能对体腔深的患者有利,与OLR相比,手术时间相似且失血量更低。体腔深度可能是确定肝7段切除术合适手术方式的有用指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ddc/11729157/cb04c5aae1d7/423_2025_3605_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ddc/11729157/60906bde2b96/423_2025_3605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ddc/11729157/cb04c5aae1d7/423_2025_3605_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ddc/11729157/60906bde2b96/423_2025_3605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ddc/11729157/cb04c5aae1d7/423_2025_3605_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of depth of body cavity at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on open and laparoscopic liver resection of segment 7.上腹部右上部体腔深度对肝第7段开放及腹腔镜肝切除术的影响
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 13;410(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03605-y.
2
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的多中心倾向评分分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):658-666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06812-z. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗位于后上肝的结直肠癌肝转移的手术和短期肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1776-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5861-x. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Outcomes after laparoscopic or open liver resection for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.腹腔镜或开腹肝切除治疗非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关肝细胞癌的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3887-3904. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10937-1. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗良性肿瘤和病变:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1518-1525. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0427. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Minor laparoscopic liver resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma is safer than minor open resection, especially for less compensated cirrhotic patients: Propensity score analysis.肝细胞癌的小范围腹腔镜肝切除术比小范围开放性肝切除术更安全,尤其对于肝功能代偿较差的肝硬化患者:倾向评分分析
Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;27(4):722-729. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌患者的长期手术结果:回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段:病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).腹腔镜与开腹局限性肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:来自广岛临床肿瘤外科学会(HiSCO)的倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5055-5061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized Approach for Laparoscopic Hemispheric Liver Resection for Segments 7 and 8.用于7段和8段腹腔镜半肝切除术的标准化方法。
DEN Open. 2025 Sep 2;6(1):e70203. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70203. eCollection 2026 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open resection for stage II/III rectal cancer in obese patients: A multicenter propensity score-based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.肥胖患者II/III期直肠癌的腹腔镜与开放切除术:基于倾向评分的多中心短期和长期结局分析
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Jul 16;7(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12599. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Suitability of Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment VII: a Retrospective Two-Center Study.腹腔镜肝 VII 段切除术的适宜性:一项回顾性的双中心研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Nov;26(11):2274-2281. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05389-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
Laparoscopic Approach to Rectal Cancer-The New Standard?
腹腔镜直肠癌手术——新标准?
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 31;10:1239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01239. eCollection 2020.
4
Robotic Versus Open Minor Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: A Multinational, Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人与开放后上段肝脏小部分切除术:一项多国、倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):583-590. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6928-1. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
5
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
6
Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using the Lateral Approach from Intercostal Ports in Segments VI, VII, and VIII.腹腔镜肝切除术经肋间入路在第六、七、八段。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2135-2143. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3516-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Use of intercostal trocars for laparoscopic resection of subphrenic hepatic tumors.肋间套管针在腹腔镜下切除膈下肝肿瘤中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1280-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5107-3. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria.手术并发症的扩展Clavien-Dindo分类:日本临床肿瘤学会术后并发症标准
Surg Today. 2016 Jun;46(6):668-85. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.一种用于腹腔镜肝切除术的新型难度评分系统。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):745-53. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166.
10
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 7;18(45):6657-68. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657.