Kauselmann Karen, Krause E Tobias, Schrade Hansjörg, Schrader Lars
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Celle, Germany.
Bildungs- und Wissenszentrum Boxberg (LSZ), Boxberg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 13;20(1):e0316044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316044. eCollection 2025.
Tail biting is one of the biggest welfare problems in pigs. However, depending on the individuals involved (e.g., tail biter/victim), pigs seem to change their behaviour prior to tail biting events, which raises the possibility of early detection and thus prediction and prevention of tail biting. In this retrospective explorative study, we used datasets from four different studies with 9 trials of rearing (4 pens/trial with 24 pigs/pen) and fattening (8 pens/trial with 12 pigs/pen) that focused on the exploration behaviour of undocked pigs towards plant-based enrichment materials. From this dataset, we identified 8 pens from rearing (n = 192 pigs) and 6 pens from fattening (n = 72 pigs) in which individual tail biters were identified. From this dataset, we investigated whether any a priori behavioural changes in exploration or feeding could be identified with respect to tail biting. Furthermore, the effects of weight parameters from suckling to fattening were examined. Using linear mixed effects models, we found that exploration duration was linked to days prior to tail biting in rearing, depending on CatPig (category of pigs: biter, victim, neutral pig) (P = 0.001), in fattening independent of CatPig (P<0.0001), and by duration, amount and frequency of feed consumption in fattening (P<0.0001). Some weight parameters covaried with CatPig in rearing (weight-gain suckling: P = 0.0018; weaning weight: P = 0.019) and fattening (weaning weight: P = 0.07; start weight at fattening: P = 0.03; weight-gain rearing: P = 0.02). Suitable indicators for future early detection trials of tail biting could be exploration duration in rearing and fattening and feeding data in fattening. Moreover, weight parameters in rearing and fattening and exploration duration in rearing may be used to identify individual pigs that might become tail biters in an upcoming tail biting event. The retrospective explorative nature of our analysis revealed interesting patterns; however, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
咬尾是养猪业中最大的福利问题之一。然而,根据涉及的个体(例如,咬尾者/受害者)不同,猪在咬尾事件发生前似乎会改变其行为,这增加了早期发现的可能性,进而有可能对咬尾行为进行预测和预防。在这项回顾性探索性研究中,我们使用了来自四项不同研究的数据集,这些研究包括9次饲养试验(每次试验4个猪栏,每个猪栏24头猪)和育肥试验(每次试验8个猪栏,每个猪栏12头猪),重点关注未断尾猪对植物性富集材料的探索行为。从这个数据集中,我们在饲养阶段确定了8个猪栏(n = 192头猪),在育肥阶段确定了6个猪栏(n = 72头猪),其中识别出了个体咬尾者。从这个数据集中,我们研究了在咬尾方面是否能识别出探索或进食方面的任何先验行为变化。此外,还研究了从哺乳到育肥阶段体重参数的影响。使用线性混合效应模型,我们发现,在饲养阶段,探索持续时间与咬尾前的天数有关,这取决于猪的类别(猪的类别:咬尾者、受害者、中立猪)(P = 0.001);在育肥阶段,与猪的类别无关(P<0.0001),并且与育肥阶段的采食量、采食量和采食频率有关(P<0.0001)。在饲养阶段,一些体重参数与猪的类别相关(哺乳体重增加:P = 0.0018;断奶体重:P = 0.019);在育肥阶段(断奶体重:P = 0.07;育肥开始体重:P = 0.03;饲养阶段体重增加:P = 0.02)。未来咬尾早期检测试验的合适指标可能是饲养和育肥阶段的探索持续时间以及育肥阶段的采食数据。此外,饲养和育肥阶段的体重参数以及饲养阶段的探索持续时间可用于识别在即将发生的咬尾事件中可能成为咬尾者的个体猪。我们分析的回顾性探索性质揭示了有趣的模式;然而,需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现。