Suppr超能文献

肥厚性小关节可用治疗方法及其局限性概述——文献系统综述

Overview of Available Treatments and Their Limitations for Hypertrophic Facet Joints-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

作者信息

Hawkins Noel, García Allison, López-Candelas Fernando, Aguirre David Salinas, Trujillo Onerys Sierra, Llerenas King López Daniela, Álvarez-Palazuelos Lucia Elizabeth, Ruiz-Ramírez Andrea Virginia

机构信息

Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, School of Medicine, Zapopan, Mexico.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Jan 2;9(1). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00140. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians worldwide face the challenging task of improving patient satisfaction by reducing pain in injured patients. Currently, available therapeutic approaches provide only short-term relief of symptoms without addressing long-term satisfaction. This has led to exploring regenerative treatment options that can deliver better outcomes. One such promising option is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, which are gaining popularity as an alternative to standard steroid injections.

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the therapeutic effects of PRP injections in adult patients with stress or traumatic injuries.

METHODS

The systematic literature review yielded 60,301 articles, books, and websites verified and removed from the final project. The final studies used in the report comprised randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports on injecting biologics into the epidural space, facet joints, or sacroiliac joints. In total, 15 reviews and 13 studies were included in this review.

RESULTS

In the Wu et al study, 46 participants were randomly divided into group A (0.5 mL PRP injection) and group B (1.5 mL methylprednisolone injection). Although group B initially showed a notable pain reduction at one week, it diminished over 6 months, with group A consistently improving, reaching an 80.96% success rate and higher patient satisfaction. In the study by Singla et al comparing PRP (group P) and corticosteroid (group S) in 40 participants, PRP demonstrated a markedly greater reduction in VAS Scale at 6 weeks and 3 months, with a 90% effectiveness compared with 75% for steroids.

CONCLUSION

PRP injections offer greater pain alleviation, disability reduction, and overall patient satisfaction improvements due to their effect on the immune response to promote the growth and proliferation of damaged tissue. It has also been shown to offer a safer alternative that carries fewer risks than that of transforaminal steroid injections due to promising clinical trials and scientific investigation outcomes. Several of the steroid injection studies proved to have mixed results and efficacy because patients reporting having similar pain relief with placebo groups that used saline injections. Further studies will be needed to evaluate PRP's long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for practical patient use in the future.

摘要

背景

全球范围内的医生都面临着一项具有挑战性的任务,即通过减轻受伤患者的疼痛来提高患者满意度。目前,现有的治疗方法只能提供短期症状缓解,而无法解决长期满意度问题。这促使人们探索能够带来更好治疗效果的再生治疗方案。一种有前景的选择是富血小板血浆(PRP)注射,它作为标准类固醇注射的替代方法正越来越受欢迎。

目的

本研究考察PRP注射对成年应激或创伤性损伤患者的治疗效果。

方法

系统文献综述共筛选出60301篇文章、书籍和网站,经核实后从最终项目中剔除。报告中使用的最终研究包括随机试验、观察性研究以及关于将生物制剂注射到硬膜外腔、小关节或骶髂关节的病例报告。本综述共纳入15篇综述和13项研究。

结果

在Wu等人的研究中,46名参与者被随机分为A组(注射0.5 mL PRP)和B组(注射1.5 mL甲基强的松龙)。虽然B组在第1周时疼痛明显减轻,但在6个月内这种减轻效果逐渐减弱,而A组持续改善,成功率达到80.96%,患者满意度更高。在Singla等人对40名参与者进行的比较PRP(P组)和皮质类固醇(S组)的研究中,PRP在第6周和第3个月时VAS评分的降低幅度明显更大,有效率为90%,而类固醇为75%。

结论

PRP注射因其对免疫反应的影响,能促进受损组织的生长和增殖,从而提供更大程度的疼痛缓解、功能障碍减轻以及患者总体满意度的提高。由于有前景的临床试验和科学研究结果,它也被证明是一种比经椎间孔类固醇注射风险更小的更安全的替代方法。一些类固醇注射研究结果不一且疗效各异,因为有患者报告称使用盐水注射的安慰剂组与之有相似的疼痛缓解效果。未来还需要进一步研究来评估PRP在实际患者应用中的长期疗效和成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fa5/11703435/e502daa7fda7/jagrr-9-e24.00140-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验