Suppr超能文献

不同类型人工移植物瓣叶再植性能的流固耦合分析数值模拟

Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction analysis for the performance of leaflet reimplantation with different types of artificial graft.

作者信息

Wang Qian, Luo Xinjin, Qiu Juntao, Hu Shengyi, Ding Xuechao, Du Tianming, Zhang Yanping, Hou Qianwen, Zhou Jianye, Jin Yiming, Qiao Aike

机构信息

College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Transformation, Beijing 100124, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100037, China.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Apr;261:108598. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108598. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, valve-sparing aortic root replacement surgery primarily addresses left ventricular dysfunction in patients due to severe aortic regurgitation, but there is controversy regarding the choice of surgical technique. In order to investigate which type of valve-sparing aortic root replacement surgeries can achieve better blood flow conditions, this study examines the impact of changes in the geometric morphology of the aortic root on the hemodynamic environment through numerical simulation.

METHODS

An idealized model of the aortic root was established based on data obtained from clinical measurements, including using the model of the aortic root without significant lesions as the control group (Model C), while using surgical models of leaflet reimplantation with tubular graft (Model T), leaflet reimplantation with Valsalva graft (Model V), and the Florida sleeve procedure (Model F) as the experimental groups. Fluid-structure interaction numerical simulations were conducted to assess the differences in blood flow between the three surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, all the three experimental groups showed no abnormal blood flow patterns in the aortic root. Additionally, the distribution of high-velocity blood flow was similar to that of the control group. Due to the changes in geometric shape after surgery, the impact locations of blood on the vessel wall varied, leading to different degrees of wall shear stress concentration at the sinus-conduit junction and the aortic valve ring in the three surgical models. During the peak systolic phase, the maximum opening area of the leaflets in the three surgical models (T, V, and F) differs from that of the control model, with the disparity in aortic valve leaflet opening area being 6.42 %, 9.17 %, and 8.63 %, respectively. When comparing the leaflet closure states, it was found that the closure velocity in Model V was close to that of Model C.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in the geometry of the aortic sinus affect the hemodynamics within the aorta, and leaflet reimplantation with Valsalva graft and Florida sleeve procedures are more stable during blood flow impacts.

摘要

背景与目的

在临床实践中,保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换手术主要用于治疗因严重主动脉瓣反流导致左心室功能障碍的患者,但手术技术的选择存在争议。为了研究哪种类型的保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换手术能实现更好的血流状况,本研究通过数值模拟研究主动脉根部几何形态变化对血流动力学环境的影响。

方法

基于临床测量数据建立理想化的主动脉根部模型,将无明显病变的主动脉根部模型作为对照组(模型C),同时将带管状移植物的瓣叶再植入手术模型(模型T)、带瓦尔萨尔瓦窦移植物的瓣叶再植入手术模型(模型V)和佛罗里达袖套手术模型(模型F)作为实验组。进行流固耦合数值模拟以评估三种手术技术之间的血流差异。

结果

与对照组相比,所有三个实验组主动脉根部均未出现异常血流模式。此外,高速血流分布与对照组相似。由于手术后几何形状的变化,血液对血管壁的冲击位置不同,导致三种手术模型中窦管交界处和主动脉瓣环处的壁面剪应力集中程度不同。在收缩期峰值时,三种手术模型(T、V和F)的瓣叶最大开口面积与对照模型不同,主动脉瓣叶开口面积差异分别为6.42%、9.17%和8.63%。比较瓣叶关闭状态时发现,模型V的关闭速度与模型C接近。

结论

主动脉窦几何形状的变化会影响主动脉内的血流动力学,带瓦尔萨尔瓦窦移植物的瓣叶再植入手术和佛罗里达袖套手术在血流冲击时更稳定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验