Suppr超能文献

与单纯化疗免疫疗法相比,放疗联合化疗免疫疗法作为寡转移性食管鳞状细胞癌的一线治疗可提高生存率。

Radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy improves survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Lv Xiaoyan, Wang Shuai, Zhang Wencheng, Pang Qingsong, Lin Qiang, Wu Yajing, Hui Zhouguang, Liu Yueping, Cheng Yunjie, Liu Qing, Wang Jun

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, 050011, Shijiazhuang, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02347-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy (RCIT) versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC) at initial diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients newly diagnosed with OESCC who received RCIT or CIT as first-line treatment between June 2018 and December 2021. Among them, 76 patients were in the RCIT cohort and 64 patients in the CIT cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to simulate random allocation.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 61 well-paired patients were selected. The median follow-up duration was 34.7 months (95%CI: 30.6-38.8 months). After PSM, the median PFS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 10.9 (95%CI: 9.4-12.4) months and 7.3 (95%CI: 6.0-8.7) months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median OS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 22.4 (95%CI: 17.5-27.4) months and 13.4 (95%CI: 10.9-15.9) months, respectively (P = 0.031). There were significant differences in PFS (median PFS: 12.9 vs. 8.6 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.003) between the group receiving radiotherapy (RT) for all lesions, the group receiving RT for partial lesions, and the CIT group, while OS was on the threshold of significance (median OS: 29.4 vs. 17.3 vs. 13.4 months, P = 0.052). No significant differences in the incidence of grade 3 or higher (G3+) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of G3+ pneumonitis (13.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.038) were higher in the RCIT group compared to the CIT group.

CONCLUSION

RCIT as first-line treatment for OESCC was safe and efficacious. RCIT improved PFS/OS compared to CIT without increasing the overall high grade toxicity rate. However, the increased incidence of pneumonitis due to RT implementation cannot be disregarded.

摘要

目的

评估放疗联合化学免疫疗法(RCIT)与单纯化学免疫疗法(CIT)作为初诊寡转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(OESCC)一线治疗的安全性和疗效。

方法

我们回顾性评估了2018年6月至2021年12月期间140例新诊断为OESCC并接受RCIT或CIT作为一线治疗的患者。其中,76例患者在RCIT队列,64例患者在CIT队列。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来模拟随机分配。

结果

经过1:1 PSM后,选择了61对匹配良好的患者。中位随访时间为34.7个月(95%CI:30.6 - 38.8个月)。PSM后,RCIT组和CIT组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为10.9(95%CI:9.4 - 12.4)个月和7.3(95%CI:6.0 - 8.7)个月(P = 0.004)。RCIT组和CIT组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为22.4(95%CI:17.5 - 27.4)个月和13.4(95%CI:10.9 - 15.9)个月(P = 0.031)。接受所有病灶放疗(RT)的组、接受部分病灶RT的组和CIT组之间的PFS存在显著差异(中位PFS:12.9个月对8.6个月对7.3个月,P = 0.003),而OS处于显著临界值(中位OS:29.4个月对17.3个月对13.4个月,P = 0.052)。两组之间未观察到3级或更高等级(G3+)治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生率的显著差异。然而,RCIT组的G3+肺炎发生率(13.1%对1.6%,P = 0.038)高于CIT组。

结论

RCIT作为OESCC的一线治疗是安全有效的。与CIT相比,RCIT改善了PFS/OS,且未增加总体高级别毒性率。然而,放疗实施导致的肺炎发生率增加不容忽视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验