Suppr超能文献

提高晚期食管癌一线免疫治疗的疗效:联合局部放疗。

Improving the efficacy of late-line immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the addition of local radiotherapy.

作者信息

Chen Yicong, He Yalin, Zhou Xiaojuan, Yu Ruixuan, Xu Yong, Peng Feng, Zou Bingwen, Zhou Lin, Gong Youling, Wang Jin, Wang Yongsheng, Huang Meijuan, Lu You, Liu Yongmei

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxuexiang Street, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 7;18:17562848251371785. doi: 10.1177/17562848251371785. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advent of immunotherapy has significantly revolutionized therapies for advanced esophageal cancer (EC). However, clinical data on combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) in advanced EC remain insufficient.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining immunotherapy and radiation as a second or subsequent line of treatment for advanced EC.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced EC who received late-line ICIs and categorized them into two subgroups based on whether they received RT. The differences in survival and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis were used to minimize confounding.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 131 patients. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.1 months in the RT group, compared to 4.3 months in the non-radiotherapy (NRT) group ( = 0.0087). The median overall survival (mOS) was 13.5 months in the RT group, which is longer than the 7.3 months in the NRT group ( = 0.014). IPTW and 1:1 PSM analysis also showed that the RT group has longer mOS and mPFS. Among them, a higher biologically effective dose (BED) was associated with better survival than the lower dose group (16.1 months vs 10.2 months,  = 0.048). RT was an independent factor of better overall survival and progression-free survival in multivariable analysis, regardless of whether IPTW was used. For any grade of AE, any grade neutropenia (60.7% vs 41.4%,  = 0.028) and esophagitis (21.3% vs 1.4%,  < 0.001) were more common in the RT group. However, the incidence of grade 3-4 AEs did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Adding RT to second-line or later immunotherapy regimens for EC correlates with enhanced survival outcomes and manageable toxicity.

摘要

背景

免疫疗法的出现显著革新了晚期食管癌(EC)的治疗方法。然而,关于晚期EC中免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)与放疗(RT)联合应用的临床数据仍然不足。

目的

本研究旨在评估免疫疗法与放疗联合作为晚期EC二线或后续治疗方案的有效性和安全性。

设计与方法

我们回顾性分析了接受晚期ICI治疗的晚期EC患者,并根据是否接受RT将他们分为两个亚组。评估生存和不良事件(AE)的差异。采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)和1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以尽量减少混杂因素。

结果

分析纳入了131例患者的数据。RT组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为9.1个月,而非放疗(NRT)组为4.3个月(P = 0.0087)。RT组的中位总生存期(mOS)为13.5个月,长于NRT组的7.3个月(P = 0.014)。IPTW和1:1 PSM分析也显示RT组的mOS和mPFS更长。其中,较高的生物等效剂量(BED)组比较低剂量组的生存情况更好(16.1个月对10.2个月,P = 0.048)。在多变量分析中,无论是否使用IPTW,RT都是总生存期和无进展生存期改善的独立因素。对于任何级别的AE,RT组中任何级别的中性粒细胞减少症(60.7%对41.4%,P = 0.028)和食管炎(21.3%对1.4%,P < 0.001)更为常见。然而,3-4级AE的发生率无显著差异。

结论

在EC的二线或后续免疫治疗方案中添加RT与生存结果改善和可管理的毒性相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86a4/12417674/95225c43dd12/10.1177_17562848251371785-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验