Mekonnen Tesfaye Hambisa, Russell Grant, Sheehan Luke R, Collie Alex, Di Donato Michael
Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. Box. 196, Gondar, Ethiopia.
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10268-5.
Evidence shows that patient outcomes following musculoskeletal injury have been associated with the timing of care. Despite the increasing number of injured workers presenting with low back pain (LBP) in primary care, little is known about the factors that are associated with the timing of initial healthcare provider visits. This study investigated factors that are associated with the timing of initial workers' compensation (WC)-funded care provider visits for LBP claims.
We used a retrospective cohort design. A standardised multi-jurisdiction database of LBP claims with injury dates from July 2011 to June 2015 was analysed. Determinants of the time to initial general practitioner (GPs) and or musculoskeletal (MSK) therapists were investigated using an accelerated failure time model, with a time ratio (TR) > 1 indicating a longer time to initial healthcare provider visit.
9088 LBP claims were included. The median time to first healthcare provider visit was 3 days (interquartile range (IQR) 1-9). Compared to General practitioners (GPs) (median 3 days, IQR 1-8), the timing of initial consultation was longer if the first healthcare providers were MSK therapists (median 5 days, IQR 2-14) (p < 0.001). Female workers had a shorter time to first healthcare provider visit [TR = 0.87; 95% CI (0.78, 0.97)] compared to males. It took twice as long to see MSK therapists first as it did to see GPs for injured workers [TR = 2.12; 95% CI (1.88, 2.40)]. Professional workers and those from remote areas also experienced delayed initial healthcare provider visits.
The time to initial healthcare provider visit for compensable LBP varied significantly by certain occupational and contextual factors. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the timing of initial visits to healthcare providers on claim outcomes.
有证据表明,肌肉骨骼损伤后的患者治疗结果与治疗时机有关。尽管在初级保健中出现腰痛(LBP)的受伤工人数量不断增加,但对于与首次就医时间相关的因素知之甚少。本研究调查了与首次由工伤赔偿(WC)资助的腰痛索赔护理提供者就诊时间相关的因素。
我们采用了回顾性队列设计。分析了一个标准化的多辖区腰痛索赔数据库,其受伤日期为2011年7月至2015年6月。使用加速失效时间模型研究了首次就诊于全科医生(GPs)和/或肌肉骨骼(MSK)治疗师的时间决定因素,时间比(TR)>1表明首次就医时间更长。
纳入了9088例腰痛索赔。首次就医的中位时间为3天(四分位间距(IQR)1 - 9)。与全科医生(GPs)(中位时间3天,IQR 1 - 8)相比,如果首位医疗服务提供者是MSK治疗师,初始咨询时间更长(中位时间5天,IQR 2 - 14)(p < 0.001)。与男性相比,女性工人首次就医的时间更短[TR = 0.87;95%置信区间(CI)(0.78,0.97)]。对于受伤工人来说,首次看MSK治疗师的时间是看GPs的两倍[TR = 2.12;95% CI(1.88,2.40)]。专业工人和来自偏远地区的工人首次就医时间也有所延迟。
因可补偿性腰痛首次就医的时间因某些职业和背景因素而有显著差异。需要进一步研究来调查首次就医时间对索赔结果的影响。