• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩期电子胎儿心率监测实践安全性的影响:一项范围综述

Influences on safety of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring practices: a scoping review.

作者信息

Kelly Sarah, Lamé Guillaume, Dixon-Woods Mary, Liberati Elisa, Kyriacou Harry, Dunn Harry, Egerton Alice, Kok Zi Ki, Jones Kathryn, Zheng Xueying Nancy, Kuhn Isla, Draycott Tim J, Winter Cathy, Burt Jenni

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e085827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085827.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085827
PMID:39806617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667265/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Suboptimal intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring using cardiotocography has remained a persistent problem (EFM-CTG). We aimed to identify the range of influences on the safety of using EFM-CTG in practice.

DESIGN

Scoping review to identify influences related to the practice of intrapartum EFM.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, British Nursing Index, Cochrane Library, from 1 January 2001 to 25 August 2024, and grey literature.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles that reported potential influences on the clinical practice of intrapartum EFM-CTG in hospital-based intrapartum maternity care settings, including primary studies, secondary analyses, reviews, reports, conference abstracts and investigations relevant to maternity and obstetrics, in English. Evaluations of technological modifications to traditional EFM-CTG monitoring and analysis were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We extracted influences on EFM-CTG from the included studies. Findings were synthesised using a best-fit framework approach, structured using an existing 19-domain framework of contributory factors for patient safety incidents in hospitals.

RESULTS

142 articles and 14 reports were included. Our synthesis identified influences on EFM practice across all 19 domains of the contributory factors framework, including those relating to cognitive, social and organisational factors and interactions between professional work and tools used for fetal monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Reducing avoidable harm associated with electronic fetal monitoring requires a systems approach based on a sound understanding of the full range of influences on practice.

摘要

目的

使用胎心监护仪进行产时电子胎心监护(EFM-CTG)效果欠佳一直是个长期存在的问题。我们旨在确定在实际应用中影响EFM-CTG安全性的因素范围。

设计

进行范围综述以确定与产时EFM实践相关的影响因素。

数据来源

2001年1月1日至2024年8月25日期间的MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus、英国护理索引、Cochrane图书馆以及灰色文献。

纳入标准

报告在医院产时产科护理环境中对产时EFM-CTG临床实践有潜在影响的文章,包括英文的原始研究、二次分析、综述、报告、会议摘要以及与妇产科相关的调查。排除对传统EFM-CTG监测和分析进行技术改进的评估。

数据提取与综合

我们从纳入的研究中提取对EFM-CTG的影响因素。使用最佳拟合框架方法对研究结果进行综合,该方法采用现有的医院患者安全事件促成因素19领域框架进行构建。

结果

纳入142篇文章和14份报告。我们的综合分析确定了促成因素框架所有19个领域对EFM实践的影响,包括与认知、社会和组织因素以及专业工作与胎儿监测工具之间相互作用相关的影响。

结论

减少与电子胎心监护相关可避免的伤害需要一种基于对实践中各种影响因素全面理解的系统方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12c3/11667265/5e4229584c1f/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12c3/11667265/e2e54d94e0ad/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12c3/11667265/5e4229584c1f/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12c3/11667265/e2e54d94e0ad/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12c3/11667265/5e4229584c1f/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Influences on safety of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring practices: a scoping review.分娩期电子胎儿心率监测实践安全性的影响:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e085827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085827.
2
IMproving the practice of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate MOnitoring with cardiotocography for safer childbirth (the IMMO programme): protocol for a qualitative study.改善产时电子胎心监护与胎儿心电图监测以保障分娩安全(IMMO 项目):一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 28;9(6):e030271. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030271.
3
Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.产时电子胎心监护与围产期脑损伤的预防
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):656-66. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000230533.62760.ef.
4
Clinical practice guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation: A systematic review.产时胎心监护图解读的临床实践指南:系统评价。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;63(3):278-289. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13667. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.连续胎心监护(CTG)作为一种电子胎儿监护(EFM)形式,用于分娩期间的胎儿评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.
6
The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.产时电子胎心监护的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Ir Med J. 2007 Feb;100(2):360-2.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis.为什么产时电子胎儿监护的安全性如此难以保证?一项结合人因/工效学和社会科学分析的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Mar 25;33(4):246-256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.分娩期间的连续胎心监护:分析、分类与管理。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectional dynamics and care disparities in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a socio-technical systems perspective.产时电子胎儿监护中的交叉动态与护理差异:一种社会技术系统视角
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07765-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis.为什么产时电子胎儿监护的安全性如此难以保证?一项结合人因/工效学和社会科学分析的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Mar 25;33(4):246-256. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144.
2
State of science: evolving perspectives on 'human error'.科学现状:对“人为错误”的不断变化的观点。
Ergonomics. 2021 Sep;64(9):1091-1114. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1953615. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Re: Training in the use of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring with cardiotocography: systematic review and meta-analysis: Response to letter to the editor: CTG training is a complex intervention and requires complex evaluations (Lightly K, Weeks AD, Scott H).
关于:使用产时电子胎儿监护及宫缩图的培训:系统评价与荟萃分析:对致编辑信的回复:宫缩图培训是一项复杂的干预措施,需要进行复杂的评估(利特 K、威克斯 AD、斯科特 H)
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1889-1890. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16757. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
4
Systems approach to health service design, delivery and improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统方法在卫生服务设计、提供和改进中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e037667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037667.
5
Achieving safer maternity care in the UK.在英国实现更安全的孕产妇护理。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 12;372:n45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n45.
6
Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor.新 FIGO 和瑞典 CTG 分类模板在识别产程第一阶段胎儿酸中毒方面的有效性受损。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):4853-4860. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1869931. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.范围综述制作中的不匹配:凸显(正式与非正式)之间的相互作用。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):930-937. doi: 10.1111/jep.13251. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: we need new research approaches.电子胎儿心率监测:我们需要新的研究方法。
BMJ. 2018 Feb 14;360:k658. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k658.
10
Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial.分娩时胎儿心率的计算机解读(INFANT):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1719-1729. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30568-8. Epub 2017 Mar 21.