Kang Stella K, Gulati Roman, Moise Nathalie, Hur Chin, Elkin Elena B
From the Departments of Radiology and Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (S.K.K.); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Wash (R.G.); Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY (N.M., C.H.); Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY (C.H., E.B.E.); and Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY (E.B.E.).
Radiology. 2025 Jan;314(1):e233448. doi: 10.1148/radiol.233448.
Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are already being marketed as noninvasive, convenient opportunities to test for multiple cancer types with a single blood sample. The technology varies-involving detection of circulating tumor DNA, fragments of DNA, RNA, or proteins unique to each targeted cancer. The priorities and tradeoffs of reaching diagnostic resolution in the setting of possible false positives and negatives remain under active study. Given the well-established role of imaging in lesion detection and characterization for most cancers, radiologists have an essential role to play in selecting diagnostic pathways, determining the validity of test results, resolving false-positive MCED test results, and evaluating tradeoffs for clinical policy. Appropriate access to and use of imaging tests will also factor into clinical guidelines. Thus, all clinicians potentially involved with MCED tests for cancer screening will need to weigh the benefits and harms of MCED testing, including consideration of how the tests will be used alongside or in place of other screening options, how diagnostic confirmation tests should be selected, and what the implications are for policy and reimbursement decisions. Further, patients will need regular support to make informed decisions about screening using MCED tests in the context of their personal cancer risks, health-related values, and access to care.
多癌早期检测(MCED)测试已作为一种非侵入性、便捷的检测方式推向市场,只需采集一份血样就能检测多种癌症类型。该技术各不相同,涉及检测循环肿瘤DNA、DNA片段、RNA或每种目标癌症特有的蛋白质。在可能出现假阳性和假阴性的情况下,实现诊断分辨率的优先事项和权衡仍在积极研究中。鉴于成像在大多数癌症的病变检测和特征描述中已确立的作用,放射科医生在选择诊断途径、确定检测结果的有效性、解决MCED检测结果假阳性以及评估临床政策的权衡方面发挥着重要作用。适当获取和使用成像检测也将纳入临床指南。因此,所有可能参与MCED癌症筛查检测的临床医生都需要权衡MCED检测的利弊,包括考虑检测将如何与其他筛查选项一起使用或替代其他筛查选项、应如何选择诊断确认检测以及这对政策和报销决策有何影响。此外,患者将需要定期支持,以便在个人癌症风险、健康相关价值观和医疗服务可及性的背景下,就使用MCED检测进行筛查做出明智决策。