Althomari Moteab A M, Khan Johra, Alfawzan Mohammed A M, Alanazi Khalid M B, Alrakhees Saud M O, Alnassar Yaqoub S A, Alshammari Faisal K, Alassaf Ahmad A F, Alrashedi Khaled S M, Alunazi Farhan K M, Alshammri Ahmad F F, Alali Thamer S H, Altookhi Abdulhakim H A
Clin Lab. 2025 Jan 1;71(1). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.241042.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections pose significant global health concerns, contributing to chronic liver diseases. Blood transfusion is identified as a potential route for the transmission of these viruses, necessitating effective screening strategies for blood donors. The aim of this study was to assess the significance of nucleic acid testing (NAT) in detecting HBV and HCV infections among blood donors who initially tested negative in serological tests. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the seroprevalence of HBV and HCV infections among blood donors in Hail.
A total of 23,954 records were retrieved from voluntary blood donors at Hail Regional Laboratory and Blood Bank from January 2020 to April 2023. Chi-squared tests were used to assess the association between the serological and NAT results, while t-tests were employed to compare the means of continuous variables.
Numbers of the reactive ELISA serological methods or screening were 36 (0.15%) for HBs Ag, 931 (3.6%) for HBcAb, 57 (0.23%) for HBsAb, and finally, 57 (0.23%) for HCV Ab. Seroprevalence was low, with a prevalence rate of 0.15% for HBV and 0.23% for HCV. The study compared serological and nucleic acid testing results for hepatitis B and C infections; a small percentage (0.01%) showed reactive NAT results, indicating early acute infections that may have been missed by serological testing alone.
The study concludes that incorporating NAT into blood screening protocols is crucial for enhancing early infection detection and reducing risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. Low seroprevalence rate suggests effectiveness of existing preventive measures.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染是全球重大的公共卫生问题,可导致慢性肝病。输血被认为是这些病毒传播的潜在途径,因此需要对献血者采取有效的筛查策略。本研究的目的是评估核酸检测(NAT)在检测血清学检测初筛阴性的献血者中HBV和HCV感染方面的意义。此外,该研究旨在确定哈伊勒地区献血者中HBV和HCV感染的血清流行率。
从2020年1月至2023年4月期间哈伊勒地区实验室和血库的自愿献血者中检索了总共23954份记录。采用卡方检验评估血清学和NAT结果之间的关联,同时采用t检验比较连续变量的均值。
反应性ELISA血清学检测方法或筛查中,HBsAg阳性36例(0.15%),HBcAb阳性931例(3.6%),HBsAb阳性57例(0.23%),最后,HCV Ab阳性57例(0.23%)。血清流行率较低,HBV流行率为0.15%,HCV流行率为0.23%。该研究比较了乙型和丙型肝炎感染的血清学和核酸检测结果;一小部分(0.01%)显示NAT结果呈阳性,表明可能仅通过血清学检测遗漏的早期急性感染。
该研究得出结论,将NAT纳入血液筛查方案对于提高早期感染检测和降低输血传播感染风险至关重要。低血清流行率表明现有预防措施有效。