Suppr超能文献

吸收系数是马兜铃酸I和马兜铃酸II毒性差异的重要决定因素。

Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II.

作者信息

Kwok Hong-Ching, Tse Hei-Tak, Ng Ka-Ki, Wang Shuangshuang, Au Chun-Kit, Cai Zongwei, Chan Wan

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Eastern Institute of Technology Ningbo, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315200, China.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2025 Jan 29;73(4):2551-2561. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

Abstract

Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; < 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; < 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; < 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.

摘要

意外接触马兜铃酸(AAs)正在全球范围内引发慢性肾病,其中马兜铃酸I(AA-I)被确定为主要毒性剂。本研究采用化学方法探究AA-I肾毒性和致癌性的潜在机制。采用相同方法对结构与AA-I相似的马兜铃酸II(AA-II)进行研究以作比较。尽管它们结构相似,但来自培养的人类细胞和肠囊实验的结果表明,AA-I的吸收效率高于AA-II(AA-I的吸收量约为AA-II的3倍;<0.001)。这种吸收增加,再加上先前观察到的AA-I还原激活酶活性较高,导致更大的DNA损伤和氧化应激,这两者都是与AA相关毒性的关键因素。细胞死亡率(80μM时AA-I为34.4±2.3%,AA-II为9.7±0.1%;<0.0001)、DNA加合物形成(AA-I约为AA-II的3倍;<0.001)以及与AA-I和AA-II浓度相关的氧化应激水平的相似模式表明,AA-I较高的吸收率是其毒性更大的一个重要因素。还发现AA-I与AA-II(天然)共存会进一步增强其毒性。由于AA-I和AA-II仅相差一个甲氧基,未来关于降低与AA暴露相关风险的研究应侧重于降低这些化合物吸收的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/11800392/96ea4dd7e394/jf4c10765_0009.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验