• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量率近距离放射治疗前列腺癌的长期疗效及抗肿瘤免疫激活反应

Long-term outcome and antitumor immune activation response in prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

作者信息

Wang Zengzeng, Wang Li, Zhang Qiang, Xu Yong, Zhang Changwen

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tianjin Beichen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Department of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40574. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040574.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040574
PMID:39809175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11596431/
Abstract

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of iodine-125 low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT)-based treatment approaches for ≤ cT3 prostate cancer (PC) patients in China, as well as the effects on the PC immune microenvironment. Data was retrospectively collected from 237 patients with ≤ cT3 PC who were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or LDR-BT alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared. In 63 cases, PC patients received RP after biopsy, received at least 6 months of ADT before RP, or received LDR-BT and deferred limited transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Immunohistological analyses and expression comparisons of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, expressing CD3, CD4, CD8, and PD-1) on tissue sections from archival prostate biopsy samples with corresponding TURP or RP history were performed by paired t test. The 8-year bPFS, PCSS, and OS rates for LDR-BT and RP were 53.4% and 63.6%, 84.9% and 86.8%, and 63.8% and 70.2%, respectively, although these differences were not statistically significant. PD-L1 was expressed in 35 of 63 cases. The average infiltration scores of TILs (expressing CD3, CD4, and CD8) were 3.6 (1-5), 2.90 (1-5), and 2.46 (1-5), respectively. PD-1 + T cells were seen in 55.6% of cases, with an average score of 0.89 (range: 0-3). In TURP tissue samples from 23 patients, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8 + T cells increased significantly. PD-1 + T cells exhibited a moderate increase, with conversion to positive PD-1 expression in T cells observed in 13 out of 14 cases. The PD-L1 expression score of PC cells was significantly elevated, with conversion to positive in 8 of 9 cases. LDR-BT monotherapy and combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and ADT are suitable treatment approaches for low-risk and intermediate- or high-risk PC, respectively. Most TILs in PC are not tumor antigen-specific T-cells. LDR-BT can stimulate anti-tumor immunity during a narrow time window and should be combined with immunotherapy as an auxiliary therapy.

摘要

为了评估在中国将碘-125低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-BT)作为治疗方法对≤cT3期前列腺癌(PC)患者的长期临床疗效,以及对PC免疫微环境的影响。回顾性收集了237例≤cT3期PC患者的数据,这些患者接受了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)、单独的LDR-BT或与雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)联合治疗,并比较了生化无进展生存期(bPFS)、前列腺癌特异性生存期(PCSS)和总生存期(OS)率。在63例患者中,PC患者在活检后接受了RP,在RP前接受了至少6个月的ADT,或接受了LDR-BT并推迟了有限的经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)。通过配对t检验对存档前列腺活检样本的组织切片上程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs,表达CD3、CD4、CD8和PD-1)进行免疫组织学分析和表达比较。LDR-BT和RP的8年bPFS、PCSS和OS率分别为53.4%和63.6%、84.9%和86.8%、63.8%和70.2%,尽管这些差异无统计学意义。63例中有35例表达PD-L1。TILs(表达CD3、CD4和CD8)的平均浸润评分为3.6(1-5)、2.90(1-5)和2.46(1-5)。55.6%的病例中可见PD-1+T细胞,平均评分为0.89(范围:0-3)。在23例患者的TURP组织样本中,CD3+、CD4+和CD8+T细胞显著增加。PD-1+T细胞有中度增加,14例中有13例观察到T细胞中PD-1表达转为阳性。PC细胞的PD-L1表达评分显著升高,9例中有8例转为阳性。LDR-BT单一疗法以及与外照射放疗(EBRT)和ADT联合疗法分别适用于低风险和中或高风险PC。PC中的大多数TILs不是肿瘤抗原特异性T细胞。LDR-BT可在狭窄的时间窗内刺激抗肿瘤免疫,应与免疫疗法联合作为辅助治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/c42f21da40af/medi-103-e40574-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/2cc243f5514f/medi-103-e40574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/23c10988172a/medi-103-e40574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/8c5451baa553/medi-103-e40574-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/ab00fd22690c/medi-103-e40574-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/c42f21da40af/medi-103-e40574-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/2cc243f5514f/medi-103-e40574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/23c10988172a/medi-103-e40574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/8c5451baa553/medi-103-e40574-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/ab00fd22690c/medi-103-e40574-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ab/11596431/c42f21da40af/medi-103-e40574-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome and antitumor immune activation response in prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.低剂量率近距离放射治疗前列腺癌的长期疗效及抗肿瘤免疫激活反应
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e40574. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040574.
2
Long-term outcomes analysis of low-dose-rate brachytherapy in clinically T3 high-risk prostate cancer.临床T3高危前列腺癌低剂量率近距离放射治疗的长期疗效分析
Brachytherapy. 2018 Nov-Dec;17(6):882-887. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
3
A Comparison Between Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation, External Beam Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation, and Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.低剂量率近距离放射治疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺、外照射放疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺以及根治性前列腺切除术联合或不联合辅助或挽救性放疗治疗高危前列腺癌的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):962-975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Do androgen deprivation and the biologically equivalent dose matter in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer?对于中危前列腺癌的低剂量率近距离放射治疗,雄激素剥夺和生物等效剂量重要吗?
Cancer Med. 2016 Sep;5(9):2314-22. doi: 10.1002/cam4.820. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy Boost and Disease Progression and Mortality in Patients With Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer.根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、外照射放疗联合近距离放疗增敏与 Gleason 评分 9 - 10 前列腺癌患者的疾病进展及死亡率
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0587.
6
Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Adenocarcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Comparative Analysis.采用放疗或根治性前列腺切除术治疗的 Gleason 评分 9 - 10 分前列腺腺癌患者的临床结局:一项多机构比较分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):766-773. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.046. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
7
Low-dose rate brachytherapy for men with localized prostate cancer.低剂量率近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌男性患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD008871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008871.pub2.
8
The Prognosis of Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy plus Brachytherapy, and External Beam Radiotherapy Alone for Patients above 70 Years with Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Population-Matched Study.对于 70 岁以上极高危前列腺癌患者,根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗联合近距离放疗与单纯外照射放疗的预后:一项人群匹配研究。
Urol Int. 2022;106(1):11-19. doi: 10.1159/000518113. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
9
Brachytherapy improves biochemical failure-free survival in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer compared with conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy: a propensity score matched analysis.与传统分割外照射放疗相比,近距离放射治疗可提高低危和中危前列腺癌的无生化复发生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 1;91(3):505-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Five-year biochemical recurrence-free and overall survival following high-dose-rate brachytherapy with additional external beam or radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.高剂量率近距离放疗联合外照射或根治性前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌患者的5年无生化复发生存率和总生存率
Urol Oncol. 2016 Mar;34(3):119.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing artificial intelligence to address immune response heterogeneity in low-dose radiation therapy.利用人工智能解决低剂量放射治疗中的免疫反应异质性问题。
World J Radiol. 2025 May 28;17(5):108011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.108011.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulation and impact of tumor-specific CD4 T cells in cancer and immunotherapy.肿瘤特异性 CD4 T 细胞在癌症和免疫治疗中的调控与影响。
Trends Immunol. 2024 Apr;45(4):303-313. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
2
Radiation-induced PD-L1 expression in tumor and its microenvironment facilitates cancer-immune escape: a narrative review.辐射诱导肿瘤及其微环境中PD-L1表达促进癌症免疫逃逸:一篇叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1406. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6049.
3
Managing the TME to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy.
管理肿瘤微环境以提高癌症治疗的疗效。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 20;13:954992. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.954992. eCollection 2022.
4
GEC-ESTRO ACROP prostate brachytherapy guidelines.GEC-ESTRO ACROP 前列腺近距离治疗指南。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.047. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Overcoming Immune Resistance in Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Advances.克服前列腺癌中的免疫抗性:挑战与进展
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 23;13(19):4757. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194757.
6
Epidemiology and genomics of prostate cancer in Asian men.亚洲男性前列腺癌的流行病学和基因组学。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 May;18(5):282-301. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00442-8. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Impacts of combining anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy and radiotherapy on the tumour immune microenvironment in a murine prostate cancer model.抗 PD-L1 免疫疗法联合放疗对小鼠前列腺癌模型肿瘤免疫微环境的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Sep;123(7):1089-1100. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0956-x. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
High dose-rate brachytherapy of localized prostate cancer converts tumors from cold to hot.高剂量率近距离治疗局限性前列腺癌可使肿瘤由冷变热。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000792.
9
Top 10 Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy.癌症免疫疗法的十大挑战。
Immunity. 2020 Jan 14;52(1):17-35. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.011.
10
Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression.调节程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)和程序性死亡配体2(PD-L2)表达的干扰素受体信号通路
Cell Rep. 2019 Dec 10;29(11):3766. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.113.