Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与透明质酸酶联合腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射用于腰椎手术失败综合征:一项随机双盲临床试验

Dexmedetomidine versus hyaluronidase along with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in failed back surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Raouf Mina Maher, Kyriacos Sherry Shehata, Hassanein Manal, Salem Gehan Ibrahim Abdel-Razek, Elsonbaty Amira, Sadik Sadik Abdel-Maseeh, Awad Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2025 Jan;20(1):61-71. doi: 10.17085/apm.24094. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem faced by chronic pain management specialists. Steroid-only epidural injections have modest efficacy because of excessive scarring. Epidural hyaluronidase (HA), functions as a depolymerizing agent, successfully breaking down adhesions and collagen bundles, whereas dexmedetomidine (DEX) helps to reduce inflammation.

METHODS

The current study is a randomized, double blind, clinical trial. The study cohort included population with persistent (> 6 months) back and/or radicular lower limb pain after laminectomy. Group I (HA group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg, sterile saline (2 ml), and HA (1500 IU) instilled in 1 mL of distilled water. Group II (DEX group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg (1 ml), DEX (0.5 mcg/kg), and sterile saline (2 ml).

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores at all follow-ups compared to the pre-injection values. At 6 months, the DEX group experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain scores than the HA group (P = 0.003). In terms of the MODI, both groups showed significant reductions in disability scores at all follow-ups relative to the pre-injection values. The DEX group showed greater improvement in MODI values than the HA group. No significant complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Both DEX and HA yielded significant improvements in pain and disability scores compared with pre-injection levels. The DEX group showed a more substantial and long-term reduction in both pain scores and disability index than the HA group.

摘要

背景

腰椎手术后失败综合征是慢性疼痛管理专家面临的常见问题。单纯使用类固醇进行硬膜外注射,由于过度瘢痕形成,疗效有限。硬膜外透明质酸酶(HA)作为一种解聚剂,能成功分解粘连和胶原束,而右美托咪定(DEX)有助于减轻炎症。

方法

本研究为一项随机、双盲临床试验。研究队列包括在椎板切除术后持续(>6个月)存在背部和/或下肢根性疼痛的人群。第一组(HA组)接受0.5%布比卡因(5毫克)、曲安奈德40毫克、无菌生理盐水(2毫升)以及溶解于1毫升蒸馏水中的HA(1500国际单位)。第二组(DEX组)接受0.5%布比卡因(5毫克)、曲安奈德40毫克(1毫升)、DEX(0.5微克/千克)以及无菌生理盐水(2毫升)。

结果

与注射前值相比,两组在所有随访时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均显著降低。在6个月时,DEX组的疼痛评分降低幅度显著大于HA组(P = 0.003)。就改良Oswestry功能障碍指数(MODI)而言,两组在所有随访时的残疾评分相对于注射前值均显著降低。DEX组在MODI值方面的改善大于HA组。未报告显著并发症。

结论

与注射前水平相比,DEX和HA均使疼痛和残疾评分有显著改善。DEX组在疼痛评分和残疾指数方面的降低幅度比HA组更大且更持久。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2470/11834887/03ca5d00aec4/apm-24094f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验