Visade Fabien, Babykina Genia, Carretero-Bravo Jesus, Deschasse Guillaume, Vandewalle Vincent, Beuscart Jean-Baptiste
Department of Geriatrics, Universite Catholique de Lille, Lille, France
Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de Santé et des Pratiques Médicales, Lille, France.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):e085004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085004.
To identify specific subgroups of older patients at risk of repeated hospital readmissions and death.
Prospective, multicentre, DAMAGE (Patient Outcomes After Hospitalization in Acute Geriatric Unit) cohort of adults aged 75 and over, discharged from an acute geriatric unit (AGU) and followed up for 12 months.
Six recruiting hospital centres in the Hauts-de-France and Normandie regions of France.
We performed a latent class analysis to identify subgroups at risk of repeated hospital readmissions and death, followed by a logistic regression analysis to determine the characteristics associated with the identified subgroups.
3081 patients were included (mean (SD) age: 86.4 (5.5)) and two subgroups were identified. In subgroup 1 (n=2169, 70.4%), only 619 (28.5%) patients were readmitted to hospital once during the follow-up, and 495 (22.5%) died. In subgroup 2 (n=912, 29.6%), all patients were readmitted to hospital at least twice, and 523 (57.8%) died. Subgroup 2 accounted for 29.6% of patients but 74.4% of hospital readmissions, with longer lengths of stay, and 51.6% of deaths. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified only four characteristics weakly associated with the risk of being in subgroup 2 (at least one hospital admission in the 6 months preceding the index hospital admission, cancer, polymedication and weight changes (gain or loss) during the index hospital admission). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 63%.
A latent class analysis showed that a population of older adults hospitalised in an AGU is divided into two subgroups with regard to the postdischarge outcomes: one subgroup (70% of the individuals) will have a low rate of hospital readmission and a moderate death rate, whereas the other will have a high rate of hospital readmission and a very high death rate. There is a need for predictive scores for both events, with a view to better targeting at-risk patients.
Trial registration number was approved by the local independent ethics committee (CPP Nord-Ouest IV, Lille, France) on 13 February 2015, with an amendment approved on 21 January 2016 (reference: IDRCB 2014 A01670 47, CNIL bxA15352514).
识别有再次入院和死亡风险的老年患者特定亚组。
前瞻性、多中心、DAMAGE(急性老年病科住院患者结局研究)队列研究,纳入75岁及以上从急性老年病科出院的成年人,并随访12个月。
法国上法兰西大区和诺曼底地区的六个招募医院中心。
我们进行了潜在类别分析以识别有再次入院和死亡风险的亚组,随后进行逻辑回归分析以确定与所识别亚组相关的特征。
共纳入3081例患者(平均(标准差)年龄:86.4(5.5)岁),识别出两个亚组。在亚组1(n = 2169,70.4%)中,随访期间仅有619例(28.5%)患者再次入院,495例(22.5%)死亡。在亚组2(n = 912,29.6%)中,所有患者至少再次入院两次,523例(57.8%)死亡。亚组2占患者总数的29.6%,但占再次入院总数的74.4%,住院时间更长,占死亡总数的51.6%。多变量逻辑回归分析仅确定了四个与处于亚组2风险弱相关的特征(在本次索引住院前6个月内至少有一次住院、癌症、多重用药以及本次索引住院期间体重变化(增加或减少))。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为63%。
潜在类别分析表明,在急性老年病科住院的老年人群在出院后结局方面分为两个亚组:一个亚组(占个体的70%)再次入院率低且死亡率中等,而另一个亚组再次入院率高且死亡率极高。需要针对这两种情况的预测评分,以便更好地针对高危患者。
试验注册号于2015年2月13日获得当地独立伦理委员会(法国里尔市西北区CPP IV)批准,并于2016年1月21日获得修订批准(参考文献:IDRCB 2014 A01670 47,法国国家信息与自由委员会bxA15352514)。