Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Elastography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was comparing diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography (UE), strain UE and shear wave elastography (SWE), with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS

Literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Google Scholar was performed in June 2023. Included studies used Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and histopathology as reference standard. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive and negative likelihood ratios and area under the curve (AUC). Meta-regression subgroup analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies and 536 lesions were included. Pooled sensitivity was not different between MRI vs UE [MRI: 94% (95% CI: 88.2%-96.9%) vs UE: 90% (95% CI: 84.7%-93.1%); P=0.153] but a difference was found for specificity [UE: 78% (95% CI: 66.3%-86.4%) vs MRI: 71.3% (95% CI: 52.1%-85%); P=0.0065]. Strain UE showed higher specificity and similar sensitivity to SWE [strain UE: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) vs SWE: 0.72 (95% 0.58-0.83); P=0.017 and strain UE: 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.93) vs SWE: 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.95); P=0.311, respectively]. AUC was similar between MRI vs UE [0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95) vs 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95); P=0.452, respectively] as was DOR [MRI: 38.083 (95% CI: 12.401-116.957) vs UE: 30.395 (95% CI: 16.572-55.75); P>0.05]. Meta-regression analysis found no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy between MRI, strain UE and SWE.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that UE when compared to MRI has adequate performance in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.