Duek Adrian, Leviatan Ilona, Jarchowsky Dolberg Osnat, Ellis Martin H
Hematology Unit, University Hospital Samson Assuta, Ashdod, Israel.
Department of Medicine A, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Blood Cancer J. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01211-1.
Fedratinib is a predominantly JAK2 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in untreated and ruxolitinib-exposed patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Based on randomized clinical trial data, it is approved for use in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-2 or high-risk disease and is distinguished from ruxolitinib in that it can be administered without dose reduction in patients with thrombocytopenia, to a platelet count above 50,000/µL. In these trials, fedratinib achieved significant spleen volume reduction in ~30-45% of patients and improvement in total symptom scores in 35-40% with good tolerability. In contrast, recently published real-world data suggest that these responses may not be as robust outside clinical trials. In the context of routine clinical practice spleen responses are documented in only 13-68%, with varying degrees of symptom improvement. This may be due to the lack of a uniform definition of ruxolitinib failure, which may influence the timing of initiating fedratinib as a second-line treatment and result in a more prolonged exposure to ruxolitinib prior to intitaing fedratinib treatment. We suggest that given the growing number of drugs available for use in MF, recognizing the failure of first-line (and potentially subsequent) treatments is critical to allow timely transition to potentially more active agents, as highlighted by the data pertaining to fedratinib.
费德拉替尼是一种主要的JAK2抑制剂,已在未经治疗和接受过鲁索替尼治疗的骨髓纤维化(MF)患者中显示出疗效。基于随机临床试验数据,它被批准用于国际预后评分系统(IPSS)或动态国际预后评分系统(DIPSS)中-2或高危疾病的患者,并且与鲁索替尼的区别在于,血小板减少症患者在血小板计数高于50,000/µL时可无需减量给药。在这些试验中,费德拉替尼使约30%-45%的患者脾脏体积显著缩小,35%-40%的患者总症状评分得到改善,耐受性良好。相比之下,最近公布的真实世界数据表明,在临床试验之外,这些反应可能不那么显著。在常规临床实践中,脾脏反应仅记录在13%-68%的患者中,症状改善程度各不相同。这可能是由于缺乏鲁索替尼治疗失败的统一定义,这可能会影响启动费德拉替尼作为二线治疗的时机,并导致在开始费德拉替尼治疗之前更长时间地使用鲁索替尼。我们认为,鉴于可用于MF治疗的药物数量不断增加,认识到一线(以及可能的后续)治疗的失败对于及时转向可能更有效的药物至关重要,费德拉替尼相关数据突出了这一点。