Kavas Mustafa Volkan, Tut Hasan, Senyurek Gamze, Elhan Atilla Halil
Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya Cad. No:156, 35330, Izmir, Balçova, Turkey.
Cardiology Department, Etlik City Hospital, Yenimahalle. 06170, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12148-9.
Pay-for-performance system (P4P) has been in operation in the Turkish healthcare sector since 2004. While the government defended that it encouraged healthcare professionals' job motivation, and improved patient satisfaction by increasing efficiency and service quality, healthcare professionals have emphasized the system's negative effects on working conditions, physicians' trustworthiness, and cost-quality outcomes. In this study, we investigated physicians' accounts of current working conditions, their status as a moral agent, and their professional attitudes in the context of P4P's perceived effects on their professional, social, private, and future lives.
First, we held 3 focus groups with 19 residents and 1 specialist regarding their lived experiences under P4P and thematically analyzed the transcripts. Second, we developed a questionnaire to assess how generalizable the qualitative findings are for a broader group of physicians. The tool has three parts questioning 1) demographic information, 2) working conditions, and 3) perceived consequences and effects of P4P. 2136 physicians responded to the survey. After refining the data, we conducted the statistical analysis over 1378 responses by using Spearman's correlation coefficient, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for categorical data, and Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis.
Thematic analysis revealed two dimensions: 1) factors leading to estrangement, and 2) manifestations of estrangement. As for the initial, participants thought that P4P affected relationships at work; family and social relationships; working conditions; quality of the specialty training; quality of healthcare services; and it caused healthcare system-related consequences. Concerning the latter, the following themes emerged: Estrangement of the physician; damaging effects on physician's psychology; physician's perception of their future life; and physician as a moral agent. According to EFA, a 5-factor structure was appropriate: F1) Estrangement; F2) adverse effects on the physician's quality of life; F3) favorable consequences; F4) physicians becoming disreputable; F5) unfavorable consequences.
The findings suggest that under P4P, physicians have become more estranged towards their profession, their patients, and themselves. They suffer from deteriorating working conditions, lack of motivation, lack of work-related satisfaction, and hopelessness regarding their future. Furthermore, P4P impairs their ability to realize themselves as moral subjects practicing in alignment with professional values and principles.
自2004年以来,绩效薪酬制度(P4P)一直在土耳其医疗保健部门实施。政府辩称,该制度鼓励医疗保健专业人员的工作积极性,并通过提高效率和服务质量来提高患者满意度,而医疗保健专业人员则强调该制度对工作条件、医生的可信度以及成本-质量结果产生的负面影响。在本研究中,我们调查了医生对当前工作条件的描述、他们作为道德主体的地位以及在P4P对其职业、社会、私人和未来生活的感知影响背景下的职业态度。
首先,我们与19名住院医师和1名专科医生进行了3次焦点小组讨论,了解他们在P4P下的生活经历,并对访谈记录进行了主题分析。其次,我们设计了一份问卷,以评估定性研究结果对更广泛医生群体的可推广性。该工具分为三个部分,分别询问:1)人口统计学信息;2)工作条件;3)对P4P的感知后果和影响。2136名医生对该调查做出了回应。在对数据进行完善后,我们使用斯皮尔曼相关系数、分类数据的探索性因素分析(EFA)和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯方差分析对1378份回复进行了统计分析。
主题分析揭示了两个维度:1)导致疏离的因素;2)疏离的表现。关于前者,参与者认为P4P影响了工作中的人际关系、家庭和社会关系、工作条件、专科培训质量、医疗服务质量,并导致了与医疗系统相关的后果。关于后者,出现了以下主题:医生的疏离、对医生心理的破坏作用、医生对其未来生活的看法以及作为道德主体的医生。根据EFA,一个五因素结构是合适的:F1)疏离;F2)对医生生活质量的不利影响;F3)有利后果;F4)医生声誉受损;F5)不利后果。
研究结果表明,在P4P制度下,医生对其职业、患者和自身变得更加疏离。他们面临工作条件恶化、缺乏动力、工作满意度低以及对未来感到绝望等问题。此外,P4P损害了他们作为道德主体按照专业价值观和原则行事的自我实现能力。