Suppr超能文献

盆腔束腹带:医生放置的位置正确吗?

Pelvic sheet binders: Are doctors placing them in the correct position?

作者信息

Kruger Marcus William, Plessis Jana du, Moodley Pravani

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Afr J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;14(4):512-517. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unstable pelvic fractures cause significant bleeding, morbidity, and mortality. Commercially available Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCDs) are used in the initial resuscitation and management of these cases. In the trauma-burdened, resource limited setting of Southern Africa, the available alternative is a pelvic sheet binder (PSB). For optimal results placement should be at the greater trochanters (GTs). Prior studies have shown that practitioners are inaccurate in their placement. This study aimed to describe placement of PSBs by doctors and factors influencing placement.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, observational, simulation-based study. Doctors working in Emergency Departments (EDs) and Trauma Emergency Units (TEUs) in Johannesburg were asked to place a PSB on two healthy male models of differing body mass index (BMI), as simulated patients (SPs). Outcomes were based on PSB position relative to the GTs, marked using an ultraviolet pen, and photographed under ultraviolet light. Data on techniques of placement, as well as practitioner factors, were also collected to investigate their influence on accuracy.

RESULTS

In this study 147/176 (83.5 %) of the PSBs placed were correct (trochanteric). Of those placed on the normal BMI SP 71/88 (81 %) were correct and 76/88 (86 %) of those on the increased BMI SP. BMI did not appear to influence accuracy of placement. Practitioner factors that had statistically significant association with accurate placement included the following: Working in the TEU, work experience of ≥6 years, a diploma in primary emergency care (DipPEC, College of emergency medicine, South Africa), all methods of placing the PSB and inspecting to find the GTs.

CONCLUSION

The overall accuracy of PSBs placement was high (83.5 %). Additional postgraduate training (DipPEC) and work experience improved placement accuracy. This study highlighted the importance of additional trauma training and areas of possible future research, such as optimal binder width and method of securing PSBs.

摘要

引言

不稳定骨盆骨折会导致大量出血、发病和死亡。市售的骨盆环加压装置(PCCD)用于这些病例的初始复苏和管理。在南非创伤负担重、资源有限的环境中,可用的替代方法是骨盆床单捆绑带(PSB)。为获得最佳效果,应将其放置在大转子(GT)处。先前的研究表明,从业者放置时不准确。本研究旨在描述医生放置PSB的情况以及影响放置的因素。

方法

这是一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性、基于模拟的研究。要求在约翰内斯堡急诊科(ED)和创伤急诊科(TEU)工作的医生在两名体重指数(BMI)不同的健康男性模型上放置PSB,将其作为模拟患者(SP)。结果基于PSB相对于GT的位置,用紫外线笔标记,并在紫外线下拍照。还收集了放置技术以及从业者因素的数据,以研究它们对准确性的影响。

结果

在本研究中,放置的PSB中有147/176(83.5%)是正确的(位于大转子处)。在正常BMI的SP上放置的PSB中,71/88(81%)是正确的,在BMI增加的SP上放置的PSB中,76/88(86%)是正确的。BMI似乎不影响放置的准确性。与准确放置有统计学显著关联的从业者因素包括:在TEU工作、工作经验≥6年、拥有初级急救护理文凭(DipPEC,南非急诊医学学院)、放置PSB和检查以找到GT的所有方法。

结论

PSB放置的总体准确性较高(83.5%)。额外的研究生培训(DipPEC)和工作经验提高了放置准确性。本研究强调了额外创伤培训的重要性以及未来可能的研究领域,如最佳捆绑带宽度和固定PSB的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89e3/11730525/497b3beba9aa/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验