Suppr超能文献

在模拟成年创伤患者中,护理人员和直升机紧急医疗服务护理人员能否准确应用骨盆固定带?一项初步观察性研究。

In a simulated adult trauma patient, can pelvic binders be applied accurately by paramedics and HEMS paramedics? A pilot observational study.

作者信息

McCreesh Samuel

机构信息

Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust.

出版信息

Br Paramed J. 2021 May 1;6(1):23-29. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-hospital treatment of suspected haemorrhagic pelvic fractures includes application of a purpose-made pelvic binder. Recent hospital studies identified poor accuracy of pelvic binder application, but there is little pre-hospital research to date.

METHODS

A pilot observational study was conducted in an NHS ambulance service to examine the accuracy of landmark identification and pelvic binder application. Paramedics and Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) paramedics were recruited via an internal advert. Participants were asked to name and identify the landmarks (greater trochanters) on a simulated patient and apply the Prometheus pelvic splint. Participants read two clinical scenarios and indicated if they would apply a pelvic binder. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of results to compare performance between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-six paramedics were recruited. A total of 92.3% (n = 12) paramedics and 100% (n = 13) HEMS paramedics verbalised the correct landmarks. A total of 23.1% (n = 3) paramedics and 61.5% (n = 8) HEMS paramedics identified the correct landmarks on both sides of the pelvis. A total of 15.4% (n = 2) paramedics and 61.5% (n = 8) HEMS paramedics applied the pelvic binder centrally over both greater trochanters. Clinical decision-making to apply a pelvic binder was largely in accordance with a local standard operating procedure.

CONCLUSION

This study supports existing research highlighting cases of inaccurate pelvic binder placement. HEMS paramedics were more accurate than paramedics, but only 39% of all binders placed in the study were applied correctly. Frequent exposure to major trauma and familiarity with pelvic binders may have resulted in greater accuracy among HEMS paramedics. Further education and training around clinical assessment of the pelvis may improve the accuracy of pelvic binder application by all paramedics. This would subsequently improve the quality of patient care and ensure adequate haemorrhage control is maintained.

摘要

背景

疑似出血性骨盆骨折的院前治疗包括使用特制的骨盆固定带。近期的医院研究发现骨盆固定带应用的准确性较差,但迄今为止院前研究较少。

方法

在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的救护车服务中进行了一项试点观察性研究,以检查地标识别和骨盆固定带应用的准确性。护理人员和直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)护理人员通过内部招聘广告招募。要求参与者说出并识别模拟患者身上的地标(大转子),并应用普罗米修斯骨盆夹板。参与者阅读两个临床场景,并表明他们是否会应用骨盆固定带。在结果分析中使用描述性和推断性统计来比较两组之间的表现。

结果

招募了26名护理人员。共有92.3%(n = 12)的护理人员和100%(n = 13)的HEMS护理人员说出了正确的地标。共有23.1%(n = 3)的护理人员和61.5%(n = 8)的HEMS护理人员在骨盆两侧识别出了正确的地标。共有15.4%(n = 2)的护理人员和61.5%(n = 8)的HEMS护理人员将骨盆固定带正确地应用于两个大转子上方的中央位置。应用骨盆固定带的临床决策在很大程度上符合当地的标准操作程序。

结论

本研究支持了现有研究中强调的骨盆固定带放置不准确的案例。HEMS护理人员比护理人员更准确,但在本研究中放置的所有固定带中只有39%应用正确。频繁接触重大创伤以及对骨盆固定带的熟悉可能导致HEMS护理人员的准确性更高。围绕骨盆临床评估的进一步教育和培训可能会提高所有护理人员应用骨盆固定带的准确性。这随后将提高患者护理质量并确保维持足够的出血控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12b3/8312364/c4419ef8d36a/BPJ-2021-6-1-23-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验