Cull R E
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;48(2):107-10. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.2.107.
The relative merits of 24-hour ambulatory EEG/ECG monitoring and routine EEG recording have been compared in a group of 62 patients attending a neurological clinic because of episodes of loss of consciousness. Overall, ambulatory EEG abnormalities were detected in 21 cases (34%) compared with 16 cases (26%) for routine EEG. Ambulatory EEG mainly improved the detection of generalised paroxysmal activity, but in some cases lateralised abnormalities were detected which were not present on the routine record. Patients who reported clinical attacks once a week or more frequently showed an improved yield of diagnostic abnormalities on ambulatory EEG, but the technique did not prove superior to routine EEG if attacks were less frequent. The indications for, and limitations of, ambulatory EEG monitoring are discussed.
在一组因意识丧失发作而就诊于神经科门诊的62例患者中,对24小时动态脑电图/心电图监测与常规脑电图记录的相对优缺点进行了比较。总体而言,动态脑电图检测到21例(34%)异常,而常规脑电图检测到16例(26%)异常。动态脑电图主要提高了全身性阵发性活动的检测率,但在某些情况下检测到了常规记录中未出现的局灶性异常。每周报告一次或更频繁临床发作的患者,动态脑电图诊断异常的检出率有所提高,但如果发作频率较低,该技术并不优于常规脑电图。本文讨论了动态脑电图监测的适应证和局限性。