• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动院前护理中的伦理问题清单。

Inventory of ethical problems in mobile pre-hospital care.

作者信息

Oliveira Simone da Silva, Ferraz Mariana Oliveira Antunes, Rosa Darci de Oliveira Santa, Freitas Kátia Santana, Souza Elaine de Oliveira, Santos Deisy Vital Dos, Malvestio Marisa Aparecida Amaro

机构信息

Universidade Federal da Bahia. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. Jequié, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Jan 10;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230539. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0539. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0539
PMID:39813495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11726900/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to construct and validate the content of an inventory of ethical problems experienced by nurses in mobile pre-hospital care.

METHOD

a psychometric approach study, developed with the following stages: (1) instrument construction through a theoretical matrix based on deliberative bioethics, scoping review and online qualitative research; (2) content validity by judges; (3) pre-testing with Mobile Emergency Care Service nurses in various Brazilian states. For content validity analysis, the Content Validity Ratio was calculated (CVR>0.45 for judges and CVR>0.35 for the target population).

RESULTS

the instrument had 44 items, distributed across four dimensions.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the constructed instrument presented sources of evidence of content validity, providing good psychometric measurements and constituting a useful tool for nurses' practice in the pre-hospital setting.

摘要

目的

构建并验证一份关于流动院前护理中护士所经历伦理问题清单的内容。

方法

一项采用心理测量方法的研究,分以下阶段开展:(1)通过基于审议性生物伦理学的理论矩阵、范围综述和在线定性研究构建工具;(2)由评判者进行内容效度评估;(3)在巴西不同州对移动急救护理服务护士进行预测试。对于内容效度分析,计算内容效度比(评判者的CVR>0.45,目标人群的CVR>0.35)。

结果

该工具包含44个条目,分布在四个维度。

最终结论

所构建的工具呈现出内容效度的证据来源,提供了良好的心理测量指标,构成了院前环境中护士实践的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Inventory of ethical problems in mobile pre-hospital care.移动院前护理中的伦理问题清单。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Jan 10;77Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20230539. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0539. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation and content validation of the Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile for Brazil.巴西老年机构评估概况的翻译与内容验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Nov;72(suppl 2):205-213. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0602.
3
Assessment of professional competence of nurses in emergencies: created and validated instrument.护士在紧急情况下专业能力的评估:编制并验证的工具。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):1865-1874. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0595.
4
Professional competence of nurses in emergency services: evidence of content validity.急诊服务中护士的专业能力:内容效度证据
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Feb;72(suppl 1):66-73. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0518.
5
Design and psychometric testing of a moral intelligence instrument for pre-hospital emergency medical services personnel: a sequential-exploratory mixed-method study.针对院前急救服务人员的道德智力测量工具的设计与心理测量测试:一项序列探索性混合方法研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01171-6.
6
The design and psychometric evaluation of the emergency medical services resilience scale (EMSRS).紧急医疗服务复原力量表(EMSRS)的设计与心理测量学评估。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 Jan;42:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Development and validation of Nurses' Moral Courage Scale.护士道德勇气量表的编制与验证。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2438-2455. doi: 10.1177/0969733018791325. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Development and content validation of a risk classification instrument.风险分类工具的开发与内容验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Sep 6;77(4):e20230502. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0502. eCollection 2024.
9
Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the ethical awareness scale for nurses working in Iranian intensive care units.护理人员伦理意识量表在伊朗重症监护病房的信度效度检验。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jun;11(6):e2168. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2168.
10
Emergency department triage decision-making by registered nurses: An instrument development study.急诊分诊决策:注册护士的工具开发研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4725-4735. doi: 10.1111/jan.16252. Epub 2024 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
What, what for and how? Developing measurement instruments in epidemiology.目的是什么?如何实现?在流行病学中开发测量工具。
Rev Saude Publica. 2021 Aug 9;55:40. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002813. eCollection 2021.
2
Major challenges and barriers in clinical decision-making as perceived by emergency medical services personnel: a qualitative content analysis.紧急医疗服务人员感知到的临床决策中的主要挑战和障碍:定性内容分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00408-4.
3
Ethical conflicts in patient relationships: Experiences of ambulance nursing students.
患者关系中的伦理冲突:救护护理专业学生的体验。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):946-959. doi: 10.1177/0969733020911077. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
Experiences of pre-hospital emergency medical personnel in ethical decision-making: a qualitative study.院前急救医护人员在伦理决策方面的经验:一项定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Dec 19;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0334-x.
5
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
[Validation of the comprehensiveness of an instrument on ethical problems in primary care].
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2014 Mar;35(1):148-56. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2014.01.39811.
7
Validity evidence based on test content.基于测试内容的效度证据。
Psicothema. 2014;26(1):100-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.256.
8
Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.在线专家小组讨论:一项可行性和实验可重复性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec 23;11:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174.
9
STROBE initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies.STROBE 倡议:观察性研究报告指南。
Rev Saude Publica. 2010 Jun;44(3):559-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000300021.