• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种皮瓣推进技术和骨膜缝合对引导骨再生过程中移植物移位的影响

Impact of Two Flap Advancement Techniques and Periosteal Suturing on Graft Displacement During Guided Bone Regeneration.

作者信息

Raabe Clemens, Cafferata Emilio A, Couso-Queiruga Emilio, Chappuis Vivianne, Ramanauskaite Ausra, Schwarz Frank

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13434. doi: 10.1111/cid.13434.

DOI:10.1111/cid.13434
PMID:39815673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11736094/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This preclinical ex vivo porcine study aimed to evaluate the effects of two flap advancement techniques and periosteal suturing (PS) on graft material displacement during primary wound closure in guided bone regeneration (GBR). Secondary objectives included assessing flap advancement and the impact of soft tissue characteristics on graft displacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized two-walled horizontal bone defects were created in second premolar sites of pig hemimandibles. Sites were randomized to using either full-thickness flaps with modified periosteal releasing incisions (MPRI) or combination flaps using the mucosal detachment technique (MDT), both with and without PS. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to measure changes in graft material thickness (GMT) at seven incremental levels (L0-L6) relative to the implant platform, before and after primary wound closure. Keratinized mucosa width (KMW), flap thickness (FT), and flap advancement (FA) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight horizontal bone augmentation procedures were performed on 34 pig hemimandibles, divided into four groups (MDT+PS, MDT-PS, MPRI+PS, MPRI-PS). Mean overall change in GMT at L0 was -24.5% ± 14.0% for MPRI and - 23.0% ± 14.3% for MDT (p ≥ 0.085). PS reduced graft displacement (-14.2% ± 11.5%) compared with no PS (-33.2% ± 16.9%, p < 0.001). FA was 8.3 ± 1.1 mm (MPRI) and 8.3 ± 1.5 mm (MDT). The mean KMW was 6.8 ± 0.9 mm, and FT ranged from 0.8 to 1.6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

PS significantly reduced graft material displacement during primary wound closure, while flap advancement techniques and soft tissue characteristics had no impact on graft stability. Both surgical techniques provided sufficient flap advancement for primary wound closure.

摘要

目的

本临床前猪离体研究旨在评估两种皮瓣推进技术和骨膜缝合(PS)对引导骨再生(GBR)一期伤口关闭期间移植材料移位的影响。次要目的包括评估皮瓣推进情况以及软组织特征对移植材料移位的影响。

材料与方法

在猪半下颌骨的第二前磨牙部位制造标准化的双壁水平骨缺损。将部位随机分为使用改良骨膜松解切口(MPRI)的全厚皮瓣或使用黏膜分离技术(MDT)的联合皮瓣,两组均分为有或无PS。在一期伤口关闭前后,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量相对于种植体平台在七个递增水平(L0-L6)处移植材料厚度(GMT)的变化。还记录了角化黏膜宽度(KMW)、皮瓣厚度(FT)和皮瓣推进(FA)情况。

结果

对34个猪半下颌骨进行了68次水平骨增量手术,分为四组(MDT+PS、MDT-PS、MPRI+PS、MPRI-PS)。MPRI组L0处GMT的平均总体变化为-24.5%±14.0%,MDT组为-23.0%±14.3%(p≥0.085)。与无PS组(-33.2%±16.9%)相比,PS减少了移植材料移位(-14.2%±11.5%,p<0.001)。FA为8.3±1.1mm(MPRI)和8.3±1.5mm(MDT)。平均KMW为6.8±0.9mm,FT范围为0.8至1.6mm。

结论

PS在一期伤口关闭期间显著减少了移植材料移位,而皮瓣推进技术和软组织特征对移植稳定性没有影响。两种手术技术都为一期伤口关闭提供了足够的皮瓣推进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11736094/3599ec62c5bc/CID-27-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11736094/febd2fb86ae8/CID-27-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11736094/3599ec62c5bc/CID-27-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11736094/febd2fb86ae8/CID-27-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11736094/3599ec62c5bc/CID-27-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Two Flap Advancement Techniques and Periosteal Suturing on Graft Displacement During Guided Bone Regeneration.两种皮瓣推进技术和骨膜缝合对引导骨再生过程中移植物移位的影响
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13434. doi: 10.1111/cid.13434.
2
Two-Step Periosteal Releasing Incision for Tension-Free Flap Closure After Implant Placement With Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration.两步骨膜剥离切口在种植同期引导骨组织再生后用于无张力瓣关闭。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Aug 1;50(4):317-321. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00032.
3
Influence of wound closure on the volume stability of particulate and non-particulate GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. Part II.闭合伤口对颗粒状和非颗粒状 GBR 材料体积稳定性的影响:体外锥形束 CT 检查。第二部分。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jun;28(6):631-639. doi: 10.1111/clr.12845. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination.盲法伤口闭合对不同引导骨再生材料体积稳定性的影响:一项体外锥形束计算机断层扫描检查
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):258-65. doi: 10.1111/clr.12590. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Periosteal pocket flap for horizontal bone regeneration: a case series.用于水平骨再生的骨膜袋瓣:病例系列
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Jun;32(3):311-20.
6
Double flap incision design for guided bone regeneration: a novel technique and clinical considerations.双瓣切口设计引导骨再生:一种新的技术及临床考虑。
J Periodontol. 2010 Jun;81(6):945-52. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090685.
7
Changes in soft tissue dimensions following horizontal guided bone regeneration with a split-thickness flap design - evaluation of 8 cases with a digital method.采用分块瓣设计的水平引导骨再生后软组织维度的变化——8 例数字化评估。
Head Face Med. 2024 Sep 28;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00456-8.
8
Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.同期种植体植入与引导骨再生术后5年再生颊骨的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估——一项随机对照临床试验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/clr.12296. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
9
Clinical comparison of different flap advancement techniques to periosteal releasing incision in guided bone regeneration: A randomized controlled trial.不同皮瓣推进技术与引导骨再生骨膜切开术的临床比较:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Feb;23(1):107-116. doi: 10.1111/cid.12960. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Management of a coronally advanced lingual flap in regenerative osseous surgery: a case series introducing a novel technique.再生性骨手术中冠向推进舌侧瓣的管理:介绍一种新技术的病例系列
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):505-13.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of flap advancement on bone graft displacement with or without membrane stabilization - a preclinical study.皮瓣推进对有无膜稳定情况下骨移植移位的影响——一项临床前研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1316. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06692-x.
2
'Lamina External Graft Overlay': The Use of Segmented Xenogenic Bone Sheets in the Reconstruction of 3D Bone Defects.“外侧板层移植覆盖术”:分段式异种骨片在三维骨缺损重建中的应用
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 8;61(4):683. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040683.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-Step Periosteal Releasing Incision for Tension-Free Flap Closure After Implant Placement With Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration.两步骨膜剥离切口在种植同期引导骨组织再生后用于无张力瓣关闭。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Aug 1;50(4):317-321. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00032.
2
Pilot Study: Periosteal Mattress Sutures as an Alternative to Pins and Screws in Guided Bone Regeneration in the Esthetic Zone.初步研究:在美学区引导骨再生中,骨膜褥式缝合替代钉和螺钉。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 Oct 24(7):s217-s226. doi: 10.11607/prd.6212.
3
Non-invasive assessment of peri-implant mucosal thickness: A cross-sectional study.
种植体周围黏膜厚度的无创评估:一项横断面研究。
J Periodontol. 2023 Nov;94(11):1315-1323. doi: 10.1002/JPER.23-0102. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
4
Clinical Evaluation of the Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap Technique for Maintaining Primary Wound Closure Over Titanium Mesh After Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Control Trial.经引导骨再生后用冠向推进式龈瓣技术维持钛网上方初级伤口闭合的临床评价:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 Oct 24(7):s36-s52. doi: 10.11607/prd.6179.
5
Effect of periodontal phenotype characteristics on post-extraction dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge: A prospective case series.牙周表型特征对拔牙后牙槽嵴尺寸变化的影响:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2023 May;50(5):694-706. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13781. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration with Periosteal Pocket Flap Technique Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Clinical Trial Study.引导骨再生联合骨膜下袋状瓣技术与自体骨块移植用于水平骨增量的比较:一项临床试验研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 July-Aug;43(4):479-488. doi: 10.11607/prd.5691.
7
Comparative Assessment of Flap-Advancing Techniques in an Ex Vivo Cadaverous Porcine Model.在离体猪尸体模型中对比评估皮瓣推进技术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):823-829. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9382.
8
Mucosal Detachment Technique for Flap Advancement in a Thin Tissue Phenotype: Technique Illustration.黏膜分离技术在薄组织表型皮瓣推进术中的应用:技术说明。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;41(4):555-560. doi: 10.11607/prd.5072.
9
Clinical comparison of different flap advancement techniques to periosteal releasing incision in guided bone regeneration: A randomized controlled trial.不同皮瓣推进技术与引导骨再生骨膜切开术的临床比较:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Feb;23(1):107-116. doi: 10.1111/cid.12960. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Influence of wound closure on volume stability with the application of different GBR materials: an cone-beam computed tomographic study.不同引导骨再生材料应用下伤口闭合对骨量稳定性的影响:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019 Feb 22;49(1):14-24. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.14. eCollection 2019 Feb.