Zhou Jiaolin, Li Lifeng, Liu Yuxin, Jia Wenzhuo, Liu Qian, Gao Xuan, Wu Aiwen, Wu Bin, Shen Zhanlong, Wang Zhenjun, Han Jiagang, Niu Beizhan, Gong Yuhua, Guan Yanfang, Zhou Jianfeng, Xue Huadan, Zhou Weixun, Hu Ke, Lu Junyang, Xu Lai, Xia Xuefeng, Yi Xin, Yang Ling, Lin Guole
Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Geneplus-Beijing, Beijing 102206, China.
EBioMedicine. 2025 Feb;112:105548. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105548. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, distant metastasis remains the primary cause of treatment failure. Early identification of high-risk individuals for personalized treatment may offer a solution. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) could assist in this process.
From September 2017 to June 2019, the study prospectively recruited 113 patients with LARC (cT3-4N0M0 or cTanyN + M0) who underwent nCRT followed by radical surgery across 8 tertiary centers. ctDNA was analysed using large-panel targeted sequencing at baseline, during nCRT, pre-surgery, post-surgery, post-adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), and during annual follow-ups for 3 years.
We analysed 103 tissue and 669 plasma samples from 103 patients. With a median 53-month follow-up, significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed if median variant allele frequency (mVAF) of baseline ctDNA per patient was ≥0.5% (PFS, HR 4.39, p < 0.001; OS, HR 5.61, p = 0.004) or ctDNA was still detectable two weeks into nCRT (PFS, HR 7.63, p < 0.001; OS, HR 5.08, p < 0.001). Furthermore, when compared to the low-risk (C1) group (characterized by "ctDNA undetected during nCRT with baseline mVAF <0.5%" or "ctDNA undetected during nCRT with TMB (tumour mutational burden) ≥20/Mb"), the high-risk (C2) group (characterized by "ctDNA detected during nCRT" or "baseline mVAF ≥0.5% with TMB <20/Mb") showed significantly worse long-term outcomes (3 y-PFS, 55.9% vs. 94.2%; 3 y-OS, 79.4% vs. 100%). The ctDNA clearance during nCRT, baseline mVAF, and TMB may be effective prognostic indicators.
Our findings reaffirm the clinical monitoring value of ctDNA and demonstrate the strong prognostic value of baseline ctDNA and its early clearance status in patients with LARC undergoing nCRT. This highlights the potential of dynamic ctDNA monitoring as actionable stratified indicators to guide personalized neoadjuvant treatment strategies.
This work was supported by the Major Grants Program of Beijing Science and Technology Commission (No. D171100002617003) and the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-C-005).
新辅助放化疗(nCRT)是局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗方法。然而,远处转移仍然是治疗失败的主要原因。早期识别高危个体以进行个性化治疗可能是一种解决方案。循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)有助于这一过程。
2017年9月至2019年6月,该研究前瞻性招募了113例LARC患者(cT3-4N0M0或cTanyN+M0),这些患者在8个三级中心接受了nCRT,随后进行了根治性手术。在基线、nCRT期间、术前、术后、辅助化疗(ACT)期间以及3年的年度随访期间,使用大panel靶向测序分析ctDNA。
我们分析了103例患者的103份组织样本和669份血浆样本。中位随访53个月,如果每位患者基线ctDNA的中位变异等位基因频率(mVAF)≥0.5%(无进展生存期[PFS],风险比[HR]4.39,p<0.001;总生存期[OS],HR5.61,p=0.004)或在nCRT两周时ctDNA仍可检测到(PFS,HR7.63,p<0.001;OS,HR5.08,p<0.001),则观察到显著更差的无进展生存期和总生存期。此外,与低风险(C1)组(特征为“nCRT期间ctDNA未检测到且基线mVAF<0.5%”或“nCRT期间ctDNA未检测到且肿瘤突变负荷[TMB]≥20/Mb”)相比,高风险(C2)组(特征为“nCRT期间检测到ctDNA”或“基线mVAF≥0.5%且TMB<20/Mb”)显示出显著更差的长期结局(3年PFS,55.9%对94.2%;3年OS,79.4%对100%)。nCRT期间的ctDNA清除、基线mVAF和TMB可能是有效的预后指标。
我们的研究结果重申了ctDNA的临床监测价值,并证明了基线ctDNA及其早期清除状态在接受nCRT的LARC患者中的强大预后价值。这突出了动态ctDNA监测作为可指导个性化新辅助治疗策略的可操作分层指标的潜力。
本研究得到北京市科学技术委员会重大项目(编号:D171100002617003)和国家高水平医院临床研究基金(2022-PUMCH-C-005)的支持。