Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Via Piero Maroncelli, 40, Meldola (FC), 47014, Italy.
Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 28;14(1):29536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80855-8.
Post-neoadjuvant therapy (post-NAT) and post-surgical circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) risk stratification may enhance the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of ctDNA-based MRD detection in LARC patients using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Plasma samples from LARC patients (N = 30) were analyzed retrospectively using the Signatera™ assay. The neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was calculated and compared to ctDNA status to predict recurrence risk and survival outcomes. ctDNA-positive patients post-NAT and post-surgery had worse Disease Free Survival (DFS) (HR: 7.82; p = 0.001, HR: 19.65; p = 0.001) when compared to ctDNA-negative patients. In the post-NAT setting, patients who responded to NAT had superior DFS compared to patients who did not clear their ctDNA or showed no radiological response (HR: 24.7, p = 0.001 and HR: 5.1, p = 0.054, respectively). When ctDNA status is used alongside the NAR score in the post-NAT setting, patients who were ctDNA-positive with an intermediate or high NAR score showed significantly worse DFS (HR: 47.5, p < 0.001) compared to ctDNA-negative patients with either a low or intermediate/high NAR score (HR: 9.8, p = 0.0301). Post-NAT ctDNA status, whether used alone or in combination with the NAR score, may predict NAT response, and improve risk stratification.
辅助治疗后(post-NAT)和手术后循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)风险分层可能会增强局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者的管理。在这项研究中,我们使用个性化的、基于肿瘤的 ctDNA 检测评估了基于 ctDNA 的 MRD 检测在 LARC 患者中的预后价值。回顾性分析了 30 例 LARC 患者的血浆样本,使用 Signatera™检测。计算了新辅助直肠(NAR)评分,并与 ctDNA 状态进行比较,以预测复发风险和生存结果。与 ctDNA 阴性患者相比,post-NAT 和 post-surgery 时 ctDNA 阳性的患者无疾病生存期(DFS)更差(HR:7.82;p=0.001,HR:19.65;p=0.001)。在 post-NAT 环境中,与未清除 ctDNA 或未显示影像学反应的患者相比,对 NAT 有反应的患者具有更好的 DFS(HR:24.7,p=0.001 和 HR:5.1,p=0.054)。当在 post-NAT 环境中同时使用 ctDNA 状态和 NAR 评分时,ctDNA 阳性且 NAR 评分中/高的患者与 ctDNA 阴性且 NAR 评分低或中/高的患者相比,DFS 显著更差(HR:47.5,p<0.001)(HR:9.8,p=0.0301)。post-NAT 的 ctDNA 状态,无论是单独使用还是与 NAR 评分联合使用,都可能预测 NAT 反应,并改善风险分层。