• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在血管痉挛性心绞痛中,心绞痛严重程度和症状改善与诊断性乙酰胆碱激发剂量相关。

Angina Severity and Symptom Improvement Are Associated With Diagnostic Acetylcholine Provocation Dose in Vasospastic Angina.

作者信息

Crooijmans C, Jansen Tijn P J, Meeder Joan G, Paradies Valeria, de Vos Annemiek M J, Woudstra Pier, Vossenberg Tessel N E, van de Hoef Tim P, Vos Nicola S, Olde Bijvank Els G M, van den Oord Stijn C H, Winkler Patty, Meuwissen Martijn, Widdershoven Jos W M G, Arkenbout E Karin, Stoel Martin G, Appelman Yolande, Beijk Marcel A M, Cetinyurek-Yavuz Aysun, den Ruijter Hester M, Elias-Smale Suzette E, van Royen Niels, Dimitriu-Leen Aukelien C, Damman Peter

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology VieCuri Medical Centre North-Limburg The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e037913. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037913. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.037913
PMID:39818972
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054411/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A coronary function test (CFT) is the recommended diagnostic test to identify coronary vasomotor dysfunction as a cause of symptoms in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Acetylcholine is the commonly used pharmacological agent for spasm provocation. We aimed to investigate an association between severity of symptoms and provocative acetylcholine dose.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included ANOCA patients undergoing clinically indicated CFT from the Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing: NL-CFT. Patients with epicardial spasm (n=251) were divided according to acetylcholine spasm triggering dose: low (2-20 mcg, EpiLOW), middle (100 mcg, EpiMIDDLE) or high (200 mcg, EpiHIGH). Patients with microvascular spasm (n=157) were analyzed irrespective of triggering dose. The patient groups were compared to each other and to a control group with negative CFT results (n=101). We assessed mean Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency and summary scores at baseline and follow-up and the proportion of patients improving or deteriorating. An inverse relationship between provocation dosage and angina frequency at baseline was found in epicardial spasm: the lower the triggering dose, the more frequently patients experienced angina (EpiLOW 48±20, EpiMIDDLE 53±21, EpiHIGH 57±19, microvascular spasm 61±21, controls 64±21, overall =0.003). A trend was seen toward most patients improving in the high triggering dose group, and most patients deteriorating in the low triggering dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant dose-dependent relationship between spasm provocation and anginal complaints exists. Acetylcholine provocation dose could be incorporated as a risk stratification factor or surrogate outcome in future clinical trials.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06083155.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉功能测试(CFT)是推荐用于识别冠状动脉血管舒缩功能障碍的诊断测试,冠状动脉血管舒缩功能障碍是心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)患者症状的病因。乙酰胆碱是常用的诱发痉挛的药物。我们旨在研究症状严重程度与诱发乙酰胆碱剂量之间的关联。

方法和结果

我们纳入了来自荷兰有创冠状动脉血管舒缩功能测试注册库(NL-CFT)中接受临床指征CFT的ANOCA患者。根据乙酰胆碱诱发痉挛的剂量,将发生心外膜痉挛的患者(n=251)分为:低剂量组(2-20微克,EpiLOW)、中剂量组(100微克,EpiMIDDLE)或高剂量组(200微克,EpiHIGH)。对发生微血管痉挛的患者(n=157),无论诱发剂量如何均进行分析。将患者组相互比较,并与CFT结果为阴性的对照组(n=101)进行比较。我们在基线和随访时评估了西雅图心绞痛问卷的平均心绞痛发作频率和汇总评分,以及病情改善或恶化的患者比例。在心外膜痉挛患者中,发现诱发剂量与基线时的心绞痛发作频率呈负相关:诱发剂量越低,患者心绞痛发作越频繁(EpiLOW组48±20次,EpiMIDDLE组53±21次,EpiHIGH组57±19次,微血管痉挛组61±21次,对照组64±21次,总体P=0.003)。高诱发剂量组中大多数患者病情改善,低诱发剂量组中大多数患者病情恶化,呈一种趋势。

结论

痉挛诱发与心绞痛症状之间存在显著的剂量依赖关系。乙酰胆碱诱发剂量可作为未来临床试验中的风险分层因素或替代结局指标。

注册信息

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT06083155 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/cf82d97ec99f/JAH3-14-e037913-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/4317596bc984/JAH3-14-e037913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/96332bf8f445/JAH3-14-e037913-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/1dbe8c4d89e2/JAH3-14-e037913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/cf82d97ec99f/JAH3-14-e037913-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/4317596bc984/JAH3-14-e037913-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/96332bf8f445/JAH3-14-e037913-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/1dbe8c4d89e2/JAH3-14-e037913-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d1/12054411/cf82d97ec99f/JAH3-14-e037913-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Angina Severity and Symptom Improvement Are Associated With Diagnostic Acetylcholine Provocation Dose in Vasospastic Angina.在血管痉挛性心绞痛中,心绞痛严重程度和症状改善与诊断性乙酰胆碱激发剂量相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e037913. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037913. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Multivessel Coronary Function Testing Increases Diagnostic Yield in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.多血管冠状动脉功能检测可提高心绞痛伴非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的诊断效果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May 13;17(9):1091-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.007.
3
Impact of vasomotion type on prognosis of coronary artery spasm induced by acetylcholine provocation test of left coronary artery.乙酰胆碱激发试验诱发左冠状动脉痉挛时血管舒缩类型对预后的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2017 Feb;257:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
4
Safety, Feasibility, and Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Coronary Function Testing: Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing.有创冠状动脉功能测试的安全性、可行性及诊断率:荷兰有创冠状动脉血管舒缩功能测试注册研究
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 1;10(4):384-390. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5670.
5
Sex-Related Differences in Vasomotor Function in Patients With Angina and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries.血管舒缩功能在伴有心绞痛和无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者中的性别差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2349-2358. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.016.
6
Efficacy of Diltiazem to Improve Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction in ANOCA: The EDIT-CMD Randomized Clinical Trial.地尔硫䓬改善非冠状动脉粥样硬化性急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉血管运动功能障碍的疗效:EDIT-CMD 随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;15(8):1473-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
Effects of radial artery spasm prophylaxis on intracoronary vasomotor responses during acetylcholine spasm provocation testing.桡动脉痉挛预防对乙酰胆碱激发试验期间冠状动脉血管舒缩反应的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 15;419:132703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132703. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
8
Vasomotor dysfunction in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease is dominated by vasospasm.血管舒缩功能障碍在心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者中主要表现为血管痉挛。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;333:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.079. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Moderate vasomotor response to acetylcholine provocation test as an indicator of long-term prognosis.乙酰胆碱激发试验的中度血管运动反应作为长期预后的指标。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1943-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0827-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
Clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety evaluation of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing among 921 consecutive white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries.921 例无阻塞性冠状动脉的白人患者中冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验的临床实用性、血管造影特征和安全性评估。
Circulation. 2014 Apr 29;129(17):1723-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004096. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Literature Review Discussing Diagnostic Challenges of Prinzmetal or Vasospastic Angina.一篇讨论变异型或血管痉挛性心绞痛诊断挑战的综合文献综述。
Cureus. 2025 May 8;17(5):e83745. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83745. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes.2024年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.
2
Comprehensive Management of ANOCA, Part 1-Definition, Patient Population, and Diagnosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.心源性卒中的综合管理,第 1 部分-定义、患者人群和诊断:JACC 最新观点述评。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Sep 19;82(12):1245-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.06.043.
3
2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2023 年 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA 慢性冠状动脉疾病患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 29;148(9):e9-e119. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
4
Design and rationale of the NetherLands registry of invasive Coronary vasomotor Function Testing (NL-CFT).荷兰侵入性冠状动脉血管舒缩功能检测登记研究(NL-CFT)的设计与原理。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 May 15;379:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.043. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Safety of Provocative Testing With Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Implications for Standard Protocols.乙酰胆碱冠状动脉内激发试验的安全性及其对标准方案的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jun 21;79(24):2367-2378. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.385.
6
Safety and prognostic relevance of acetylcholine testing in patients with stable myocardial ischaemia or myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries.稳定型心肌缺血或心肌梗死伴非阻塞性冠状动脉患者乙酰胆碱试验的安全性和预后相关性。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Oct 7;18(8):e666-e676. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00971.
7
Features of atherosclerosis in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease.心绞痛而无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的动脉粥样硬化特征。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Aug 5;18(5):e397-e404. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00875.
8
Acetylcholine Rechallenge: A First Step Toward Tailored Treatment in Patients With Coronary Artery Spasm.乙酰胆碱再挑战:冠状动脉痉挛患者个体化治疗的第一步。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.003.
9
Untangling the pathophysiologic link between coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.厘清冠状动脉微血管功能障碍与射血分数保留型心力衰竭之间的病理生理联系。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Nov 14;42(43):4431-4441. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab653.
10
Principles and pitfalls in coronary vasomotor function testing.冠状动脉血管舒缩功能检测的原则与陷阱。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 18;17(15):1271-1280. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00402.