Zhang Wei, Zhai Shengrui, Dou Jinfa, Zhang Shoumin, Liu Hongwei
Department of Dermatology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 16;317(1):252. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03717-3.
Patients with progressing facial vitiligo who had been treated with upadacitinib, 308 nm excimer light and upadacitinib combined with 308 nm excimer light were selected for retrospective analysis and comparison of their efficacy and safety. Efficacy was evaluated using the Vitiligo Area Severity Index (VASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline, after 8 weeks, and after 20 weeks. The progression of skin lesions was monitored through reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), while adverse reactions were documented. In the combination treatment group, the average VASI at baseline was 0.875 ± 0.4111, which decreased to 0.56 ± 0.32 at week 8 and 0.23 ± 0.218 at week 20 of follow-up (F = 9.918, p = 0.001). RCM analysis indicated that cases achieving VASI100 showed restoration to normalcy regarding loss of integrity within the pigment ring in lesion areas. Although one patient experienced exacerbation of acne, this condition was manageable with topical medication. In contrast, the average VASI score in the 308 nm excimer light group prior to treatment was recorded at 0.908 ± 0.334; by week twenty, it further declined to an average of 0.495 ± 0.4196. The differences observed were statistically significant (F = 28.644, p < 0.001). For patients in the upadacitinib group, the initial average VASI score was noted as being 0.825 ± 0.34; by twenty weeks it averaged approximately 0.53 ± 0.33; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (F = 2.87, p = 0.14). The efficacy of the combined treatment group was significantly superior compared to both other groups (F = 3.927, p = 0.026). In conclusion, upadacitinib combined with308nm excimer light represents an effective therapeutic option for progressive facial vitiligo and is associated with fewer adverse reactions as well as improved quality of life for patients.
选取接受乌帕替尼、308nm准分子光以及乌帕替尼联合308nm准分子光治疗的进展期面部白癜风患者,进行回顾性分析,比较其疗效和安全性。在基线、8周后以及20周后,使用白癜风面积严重程度指数(VASI)和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评估疗效。通过反射式共聚焦显微镜(RCM)监测皮肤病变的进展情况,并记录不良反应。在联合治疗组中,基线时的平均VASI为0.875±0.4111,随访第8周时降至0.56±0.32,第20周时降至0.23±0.218(F=9.918,p=0.001)。RCM分析表明,达到VASI100的病例在病变区域色素环完整性丧失方面恢复正常。虽然有1例患者痤疮加重,但局部用药可控制。相比之下,308nm准分子光组治疗前的平均VASI评分为0.908±0.334;到第20周时,进一步降至平均0.495±0.4196。观察到的差异具有统计学意义(F=28.644,p<0.001)。对于乌帕替尼组的患者,初始平均VASI评分为0.825±0.34;到20周时平均约为0.53±0.33;然而,这些差异未达到统计学意义(F=2.87,p=0.14)。联合治疗组的疗效明显优于其他两组(F=3.927,p=0.026)。总之,乌帕替尼联合308nm准分子光是进展期面部白癜风的一种有效治疗选择,不良反应较少,患者生活质量得到改善。