Suppr超能文献

通过克服区域监管要求的现有差异实现生物类似药开发的全球协调——描述性综述的结果

Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development by Overcoming Existing Differences in Regional Regulatory Requirements - Outcomes of a Descriptive Review.

作者信息

Kirchlechner Thomas M, Cohen Hillel P

机构信息

Sandoz GmbH, Biochemiestrasse 10, Kundl, 6250, Austria.

, Highland Park, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00740-4. Epub 2025 Jan 16.

Abstract

Global harmonization of biosimilar developmental requirements will facilitate development leading to increased patient and societal benefits. However, there are several technical and regulatory hurdles that must be addressed to harmonize the regulatory requirements in different countries and regions. At times, there is a requirement for use of locally sourced reference product, forcing biosimilar developers to repeat analytical or clinical comparability studies against reference product batches sourced from within a given country. While most health authorities no longer require comparative animal toxicology studies of the proposed biosimilar and reference product, these are still required in several countries, forcing biosimilar companies to conduct such studies or risk non-approval of their product. At times, different health authorities request different clinical study designs. In some jurisdictions there is a requirement to generate clinical data in local ethnic populations. Some health authorities require a hybrid label that combines clinical data from the reference biologic and the biosimilar, in the patient leaflet. Recommendations are provided to address each of these hurdles to facilitate global regulatory harmonization of biosimilars. Overcoming these barriers will ultimately increase patient access to these medicines in all regions while providing financial relief to healthcare systems.

摘要

生物类似药研发要求的全球协调将促进研发,为患者和社会带来更多益处。然而,要协调不同国家和地区的监管要求,还需克服若干技术和监管障碍。有时,会要求使用本地来源的参比产品,这迫使生物类似药研发企业针对从特定国家境内获取的参比产品批次重复进行分析或临床可比性研究。虽然大多数卫生当局不再要求对拟议的生物类似药和参比产品进行比较动物毒理学研究,但仍有几个国家有此要求,这迫使生物类似药公司进行此类研究,否则其产品可能面临不获批的风险。有时,不同的卫生当局要求不同的临床研究设计。在一些司法管辖区,要求在当地种族人群中生成临床数据。一些卫生当局要求在患者说明书中使用混合标签,将参比生物制品和生物类似药的临床数据结合起来。本文针对这些障碍提出了相应建议,以促进生物类似药的全球监管协调。克服这些障碍最终将增加所有地区患者获得这些药物的机会,同时减轻医疗系统的财政负担。

相似文献

2
Demystifying biosimilars: development, regulation and clinical use.
Future Oncol. 2019 Mar;15(7):777-790. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0680. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
3
Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025 Jan 27;26(1):46. doi: 10.1208/s12249-025-03038-2.
4
Global regulatory standards for the approval of biosimilars.
Food Drug Law J. 2010;65(4):819-37, ii-iii.
5
Biosimilar development and review process in the BRICS-TM countries: Proposal for a standardized model to improve regulatory performance.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;15(2):215-236. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2034498. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Dec;114(12):2696-2705. doi: 10.1002/bit.26438. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
A 'Global Reference' Comparator for Biosimilar Development.
BioDrugs. 2017 Aug;31(4):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0227-4.
8
An Overview of Current Regulatory Requirements for Approval of Biosimilar Insulins.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jul;17(7):510-26. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0362. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
9
The US approach to biosimilars: the long-awaited FDA approval pathway.
BioDrugs. 2012 Dec 1;26(6):357-61. doi: 10.2165/11635830-000000000-00000.
10
Considerations related to comparative clinical studies for biosimilars.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Mar;20(3):265-274. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1876024. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamics of biological markets with multiple biosimilar competitors in the United States.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2024 Nov;24(11):1271-1278. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2412648. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
3
Do the Outcomes of Clinical Efficacy Trials Matter in Regulatory Decision-Making for Biosimilars?
BioDrugs. 2023 Nov;37(6):855-871. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00631-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
5
A Data Driven Approach to Support Tailored Clinical Programs for Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):108-123. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2785.
6
End animal testing for biosimilar approval.
Science. 2022 Jul 8;377(6602):162-163. doi: 10.1126/science.add4664. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
7
Qualitative Analysis of the Design and Implementation of Benefit-Sharing Programs for Biologics Across Europe.
BioDrugs. 2022 Mar;36(2):217-229. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00523-z. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Regulatory challenges with biosimilars: an update from 20 countries.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 May;1491(1):42-59. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14522. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
9
The controversy around technical standards for similar biotherapeutics: barriers to access and competition?.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1518-1522. doi: 10.1002/pds.5100. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
Streamlined approval of biosimilars: moving on from the confirmatory efficacy trial.
Drug Discov Today. 2020 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验