Stoltz Michael J, Smith Nolan S, Abhari Sarag, Whitaker John, Baker James F, Smith Langan S, Bhimani Rohat, Yakkanti Madhusudhan R, Malkani Arthur L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Department of Orthopedics, UofL Health, ULP Orthopedics, Louisville, KY, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 12;30:101488. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101488. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) was introduced to provide surgeons with virtual preoperative planning and intraoperative information to achieve the desired surgical goals in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures following primary TKA using RA-TKA vs manual instrumentation.
This was a retrospective cohort review study comparing 393 primary RA-TKAs vs 312 manual TKAs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The same cementless implant design was utilized in all cases at a single institution. There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. Outcome measures included range-of-motion, Knee Society (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and overall patient satisfaction scores along with complications and survivorship.
Compared to manual TKA, the RA-TKA group had significant higher postoperative KSS Function and Knee scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores ( < .001). A total percentage of 95.0% of RA-TKA vs 87.4% of manual TKAs were very satisfied or satisfied ( = .001). Survivorship with all-cause failure as the endpoint at 3 years was 96.9% in the RA-TKA group compared to 95.8% in the manual group ( = .54).
RA-TKA demonstrated significant improvement over manual jig-based instruments in KSS Function, KSS Knee, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores following primary TKA with no differences in complications and revision incidence. RA-TKA provided a virtual 3-dimensional preoperative plan along with intraoperative information for adjustments to approximate the patients' native joint line and achieve a well-balanced soft-tissue sleeve about the knee for primary TKA.
引入机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)旨在为外科医生提供虚拟术前规划和术中信息,以实现预期的手术目标,从而改善患者预后。本研究的目的是比较采用RA-TKA与手动器械进行初次全膝关节置换术后的临床结果和患者报告的结局指标。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了393例初次RA-TKA与312例手动全膝关节置换术,随访时间至少为2年。在单一机构的所有病例中均采用相同的非骨水泥植入物设计。两组在年龄或性别上无显著差异。结局指标包括活动范围、膝关节协会(KSS)评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数、遗忘关节评分-12、关节置换的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分,以及总体患者满意度评分,同时记录并发症和生存率。
与手动全膝关节置换术相比,RA-TKA组术后KSS功能和膝关节评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数以及关节置换的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分显著更高(P <.001)。RA-TKA组95.0%的患者与手动全膝关节置换术组87.4%的患者非常满意或满意(P =.001)。以全因失败为终点的3年生存率,RA-TKA组为96.9%,手动组为95.8%(P =.54)。
在初次全膝关节置换术后,RA-TKA在KSS功能、KSS膝关节评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数、关节置换的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分以及患者满意度评分方面,相较于基于手动夹具的器械有显著改善,并发症和翻修发生率无差异。RA-TKA提供了虚拟三维术前规划以及术中调整信息,以接近患者的天然关节线,并在初次全膝关节置换术中实现膝关节周围软组织袖套的良好平衡。