与故意无保护性行为相关的态度、规范和感知控制方面的性别差异:台湾顺性别异性恋男女大学生运动员之间基于社会心理理论的比较。
Gender disparities in attitudes, norms, and perceived control related to intentional condomless sexual intercourse: A psychosocial theory-driven comparison among cisgender heterosexual male and female college varsity athletes in Taiwan.
作者信息
Huang Jiun-Hau, Li Fang-Yu, Hsu Chia-Hsien
机构信息
Institute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
出版信息
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100504. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
BACKGROUND
While condom use has been extensively studied as a protective behavior, research directly focusing on condomless sexual intercourse (CSI) as a distinct and intentional risk behavior, particularly regarding gender differences, remains scarce.
METHODS
Building upon the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study addresses this gap by comparing TPB factors and individual TPB items regarding intentional CSI among cisgender heterosexual college varsity athletes in Taiwan ( = 1348).
RESULTS
High CSI intention was more prevalent among men (53.6 %) than women (31.7 %). Our expanded TPB framework identified five distinct TPB factors pertaining to attitudes, norms, and perceived control. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all five TPB factors were significantly associated with CSI intention among men, but only three among women. Notably, our factor analysis differentiated attitudes toward positive/negative outcomes of CSI and perceived control under facilitating/constraining conditions, revealing attitudes toward positive outcomes of CSI as the strongest driver of CSI intention among both men (AOR = 2.51-4.09) and women (AOR = 3.79-5.71). Further analysis of TPB items disclosed that men prioritized psychological pleasure (AOR = 2.18), whereas women exhibited a "partner-centered" tendency, emphasizing trust by sex partners (AOR = 3.43).
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, men exhibited more favorable views toward CSI than women, with gender differences evident in the differential associations of varying TPB factors and items with CSI intention. Future research could explore the development of these differential attitudes, norms, and perceived control concerning CSI. Given the modifiable nature of TPB variables, our study's insights can inform actionable strategies and targeted interventions tailored for young men and women.
背景
虽然使用避孕套作为一种保护行为已得到广泛研究,但直接将无保护性行为(CSI)作为一种独特且有意为之的风险行为进行研究,尤其是关于性别差异的研究仍然很少。
方法
基于计划行为理论(TPB),本研究通过比较台湾顺性别异性恋大学体育代表队运动员(n = 1348)中与有意进行无保护性行为相关的TPB因素和个体TPB项目,填补了这一空白。
结果
有较高无保护性行为意愿的男性(53.6%)比女性(31.7%)更为普遍。我们扩展的TPB框架确定了与态度、规范和感知控制相关的五个不同的TPB因素。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,所有五个TPB因素在男性中均与无保护性行为意愿显著相关,但在女性中只有三个因素相关。值得注意的是,我们的因素分析区分了对无保护性行为的积极/消极结果的态度以及在促进/限制条件下的感知控制,揭示出对无保护性行为积极结果的态度是男性(调整后比值比[AOR]=2.51 - 4.09)和女性(AOR = 3.79 - 5.71)中无保护性行为意愿的最强驱动因素。对TPB项目的进一步分析表明,男性优先考虑心理愉悦(AOR = 2.18),而女性表现出“以伴侣为中心”的倾向,强调性伴侣的信任(AOR = 3.43)。
结论
总体而言,男性对无保护性行为的看法比女性更为积极,不同的TPB因素和项目与无保护性行为意愿的差异关联中存在明显的性别差异。未来的研究可以探索这些关于无保护性行为的不同态度、规范和感知控制的形成。鉴于TPB变量的可改变性质,我们研究的见解可为针对年轻男性和女性的可行策略和有针对性的干预措施提供参考。