Irmer Barnabas, Wlochowitz Darius, Krekeler Carolin, Richter Katharina Maria, Chandrabalan Suganja, Bayerlova Michaela, Wolff Alexander, Lenz Georg, Conradi Lena-Christin, Schildhaus Hans-Ulrich, Stadelmann Christine, Rohde Veit, Proescholdt Martin, Salinas Gabriela, Homayounfar Kia, Kuhlmann Tanja, Hailfinger Stephan, Pukrop Tobias, Menck Kerstin, Beissbarth Tim, Bleckmann Annalen
Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University of Münster, Germany.
West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Münster, Germany.
Mol Oncol. 2025 Mar;19(3):614-634. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13748. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
The transcriptomic classification of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) into distinct consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) is a well-described strategy for patient stratification. However, the molecular nature of CRC metastases remains poorly investigated. To this end, this study aimed to identify and compare organotropic CMS frequencies in CRC liver and brain metastases. Compared to reported CMS frequencies in primary CRC, liver metastases from CRC patients were CMS4-enriched and CMS3-depleted, whereas brain metastases mainly clustered as CMS3 and rarely as CMS4. Regarding overall survival rates, CMS4 was the most favorable subtype for patients with hepatic lesions, followed by CMS1 and CMS2. The survival of patients with brain metastases did not correlate with CMS. However, we identified a CMS3-related metabolic gene signature, specifically upregulated in central nervous system (CNS)-infiltrating CRC, as a negative prognostic marker and potential tumor progressor. In summary, subtyping of CRC metastases revealed an organotropic CMS distribution in liver and brain with impact on patient survival. CNS-infiltrating CRC samples were enriched for CMS3 and predictive metabolic biomarkers, suggesting metabolic dysregulation of CRC cells as a prerequisite for metastatic colonization of the brain.
将原发性结直肠癌(CRC)转录组分类为不同的共识分子亚型(CMSs)是一种用于患者分层的成熟策略。然而,CRC转移灶的分子特征仍研究不足。为此,本研究旨在识别并比较CRC肝转移灶和脑转移灶中器官特异性CMS的频率。与原发性CRC中报道的CMS频率相比,CRC患者的肝转移灶富含CMS4且缺乏CMS3,而脑转移灶主要聚集为CMS3,很少为CMS4。关于总生存率,CMS4是肝转移患者最有利的亚型,其次是CMS1和CMS2。脑转移患者的生存率与CMS无关。然而,我们确定了一个与CMS3相关的代谢基因特征,该特征在浸润中枢神经系统(CNS)的CRC中特异性上调,可作为不良预后标志物和潜在的肿瘤进展促进因子。总之,CRC转移灶的亚型分析揭示了肝和脑中器官特异性CMS的分布,对患者生存有影响。浸润CNS的CRC样本富含CMS3和预测性代谢生物标志物,提示CRC细胞的代谢失调是脑转移定植的先决条件。