Suppr超能文献

剥脱性二氧化碳激光(10,600纳米)与微针治疗硬斑病的对比研究:皮肤镜及组织病理学评估

Comparative study between fractional CO laser (10,600 nm) and microneedling in treatment of morphea: dermoscopic and histopathological evaluation.

作者信息

El-Shahawy Mai M, Farag Asmaa S, El-Khalawany Mohamed A, Pessar Doaa A H

机构信息

Dermatology and Venereology Department, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 18;317(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03674-x.

Abstract

Morphea is a chronic inflammatory fibrosing disorder. Since fibrosis is the hallmark of both scars and morphea, our attention was raised for the possible use of Fractional Ablative CO lasers and microneedling as treatment modalities for morphea. To compare the efficacy and safety of Fractional Ablative CO lasers and microneedling in the treatment of morphea. This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 patients with morphea, diagnosed clinically and histopathologically. These patients were divided into two groups; Group 1 (n = 15) received treatment with Fractional Ablative CO laser, and Group 2 (n = 15) received microneedling treatment. Each patient in both groups underwent a total of three sessions, one session per month. Treatment assessment was performed 1 month after the last session using Photographic documentation, clinical evaluation with the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT), dermoscopic imaging and histopathological evaluation with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and Masson's Trichrome stains. Additionally, patient satisfaction and side effects were evaluated at the end of treatment. A statistically significant decrease in the clinical score (LoSCAT) of morphea was observed in both the Fractional CO laser and microneedling groups at the end of treatment. Furthermore, the histopathological score significantly improved in both groups regarding dermal vasculature, infiltrate, epidermal and dermal changes, and adnexal and periappendiceal fat. A high degree of satisfaction was reported among patients in both groups. Both factional CO and microneedling are safe, effective, and well-tolerated modalities for the treatment of morphea.

摘要

硬斑病是一种慢性炎症性纤维化疾病。由于纤维化是瘢痕和硬斑病的共同特征,我们开始关注剥脱性分数CO2激光和微针治疗硬斑病的可能性。比较剥脱性分数CO2激光和微针治疗硬斑病的疗效和安全性。本比较性横断面研究对30例经临床和组织病理学诊断为硬斑病的患者进行。这些患者分为两组;第1组(n = 15)接受剥脱性分数CO2激光治疗,第2组(n = 15)接受微针治疗。两组中的每位患者均共接受三次治疗,每月一次。在最后一次治疗后1个月,使用照片记录、用局限性硬皮病皮肤评估工具(LoSCAT)进行临床评估、皮肤镜成像以及用苏木精和伊红(H&E)及马松三色染色进行组织病理学评估来进行治疗评估。此外,在治疗结束时评估患者满意度和副作用。在治疗结束时,剥脱性分数CO2激光组和微针组的硬斑病临床评分(LoSCAT)均出现统计学上的显著下降。此外,两组在真皮血管、浸润、表皮和真皮变化以及附属器和附属器周围脂肪方面的组织病理学评分均显著改善。两组患者均报告了高度满意度。剥脱性分数CO2激光和微针都是治疗硬斑病安全、有效且耐受性良好的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验