delaO-Escamilla Alejandra, Valdez-Zertuche Jair A, Lara-Arias Jorge, Noyola-Pérez Andrés, Villarreal-Martínez Alejandra, Chávez-Álvarez Sonia, Cuéllar-Barboza Adrián, Franco-Márquez Rodolfo, Ocampo-Candiani Jorge, Vázquez-Martínez Osvaldo T
Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.
Bone and Tissue Bank Laboratory, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.
Int J Dermatol. 2025 Apr;64(4):702-711. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17554. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
Facial aging, characterized by structural decline and loss of collagen and elastin, has led to increased demand for rejuvenation treatments. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as a promising option, but comparative studies on their application methods are limited.
Our aim was to compare the efficacy of ADSC combined with microneedling or CO laser for facial rejuvenation.
Twenty-seven participants were randomized into two groups: Microneedling (MN, n = 14) or CO laser (n = 13). Each group underwent three treatment sessions at 4-week intervals. The ADSC solution was applied to one side and the placebo to the other using a split-face design. We performed objective evaluations (UV spots, brown spots, wrinkles, texture, pores, red areas, and porphyrins) and subjective assessments, including clinical photographs, patient satisfaction scales, and histological analysis of skin biopsies.
The CO laser with the ADSC group showed significantly more significant improvements in UV spots (P = 0.002) and wrinkles (P = 0.002) compared to the MN with the ADSC group. Histological analysis revealed superior elastin fibers and epidermal thickness improvements with CO laser treatment. Patient satisfaction was higher in the CO laser group, with 84.6% reporting complete satisfaction compared to 50% in the MN group.
The combination of CO laser with ADSCs demonstrated superior efficacy for facial rejuvenation compared to MN with ADSCs. This approach improved UV spots, wrinkles, skin structure, and overall patient satisfaction. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up are needed to confirm long-term efficacy.
面部老化的特征是结构衰退以及胶原蛋白和弹性蛋白的流失,这导致对面部年轻化治疗的需求增加。脂肪来源干细胞(ADSCs)已成为一种有前景的选择,但关于其应用方法的比较研究有限。
我们的目的是比较ADSC联合微针或CO2激光用于面部年轻化的疗效。
27名参与者被随机分为两组:微针组(MN,n = 14)或CO2激光组(n = 13)。每组每隔4周进行3次治疗。采用面部双侧对照设计,将ADSC溶液应用于一侧,将安慰剂应用于另一侧。我们进行了客观评估(紫外线斑点、褐色斑点、皱纹、质地、毛孔、红色区域和卟啉)和主观评估,包括临床照片、患者满意度量表以及皮肤活检的组织学分析。
与ADSC联合微针组相比,ADSC联合CO2激光组在紫外线斑点(P = 0.002)和皱纹(P = 0.002)方面显示出更显著的改善。组织学分析显示,CO2激光治疗在弹性纤维和表皮厚度改善方面更优。CO2激光组患者满意度更高,84.6%的患者报告完全满意,而微针组为50%。
与ADSC联合微针相比,ADSC联合CO2激光在面部年轻化方面显示出更优的疗效。这种方法改善了紫外线斑点、皱纹、皮肤结构以及患者总体满意度。需要进行更大样本量和更长随访时间的进一步研究以确认长期疗效。