Suppr超能文献

高危手术期间决策支持引导的液体负荷试验及每搏输出量反应:一项随机对照试验的事后分析

Decision support guided fluid challenges and stroke volume response during high-risk surgery: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Coeckelenbergh Sean, Rinehart Joseph, Desebbe Olivier, Rogoz Nicolas, Dagachi Mastouri Amira, Maghen Bryan, Cannesson Maxime, Vincent Jean-Louis, Duranteau Jacques, Joosten Alexandre

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92868, USA.

Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Jan 18. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01261-7.

Abstract

Intravenous fluid is administered during high-risk surgery to optimize stroke volume (SV). To assess ongoing need for fluids, the hemodynamic response to a fluid bolus is evaluated using a fluid challenge technique. The Acumen Assisted Fluid Management (AFM) system is a decision support tool designed to ease the application of fluid challenges and thus improve fluid administration during high-risk surgery. In this post hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, we compared the rates of fluid responsiveness (defined as an increase in SV of ≥ 10%) after AFM-guided or clinician-initiated (control) fluid challenges. Patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to AFM-guided or clinician-initiated groups for fluid challenges titration, which consisted of 250-mL boluses of crystalloid or albumin given over 5 min. The fluid responsiveness rates and the mean SV increase in the two groups were compared. The original study included 86 patients (44 in the AFM group and 42 in the clinician-initiated group) and this sub-study analysed 85 patients with a total of 448 fluid challenges. The median rate of fluid responsiveness was greater in the AFM than in the control group (50 [44-71] % vs 33 [20-40] %, p<0.001). The mean increase in SV after fluid challenge was also higher in the AFM than in the control group (12 [9-16] % vs 6 [3-10] %, p<0.001). AFM-initiated fluid challenges were more often associated with the desired increase in SV than were clinician-initiated fluid challenges, and absolute SV increases were greater.

摘要

在高风险手术期间给予静脉输液以优化每搏输出量(SV)。为评估对液体的持续需求,使用液体负荷试验技术评估对液体推注的血流动力学反应。敏锐辅助液体管理(AFM)系统是一种决策支持工具,旨在便于应用液体负荷试验,从而改善高风险手术期间的液体输注。在这项对一项随机对照试验数据的事后分析中,我们比较了AFM引导或临床医生发起(对照)的液体负荷试验后液体反应性(定义为SV增加≥10%)的发生率。接受高风险腹部手术的患者被随机分配到AFM引导组或临床医生发起组进行液体负荷试验滴定,试验包括在5分钟内给予250毫升晶体液或白蛋白推注。比较了两组的液体反应性发生率和平均SV增加情况。原始研究纳入了86例患者(AFM组44例,临床医生发起组42例),本亚组研究分析了85例患者,共进行了448次液体负荷试验。AFM组的液体反应性中位数高于对照组(50[44 - 71]%对33[20 - 40]%,p<0.001)。液体负荷试验后AFM组的SV平均增加也高于对照组(12[9 - 16]%对6[3 - 10]%,p<0.001)。与临床医生发起的液体负荷试验相比,AFM发起的液体负荷试验更常与期望的SV增加相关,且SV的绝对增加更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验