Suppr超能文献

辅助液体管理软件指导术中液体管理。

Assisted Fluid Management Software Guidance for Intraoperative Fluid Administration.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):273-283. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003790.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Excessive or inadequate fluid administration causes complications, but despite this, fluid administration during noncardiac surgery is highly variable. Goal-directed management helps optimize the amount and timing of fluid administration; however, implementation is difficult because algorithms are complex. The authors therefore tested the performance of the Acumen Assisted Fluid Management software (Edwards Lifesciences, USA), which is designed to guide optimal intravenous fluid administration during surgery.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, single-arm cohort evaluation, the authors enrolled 330 adults scheduled for moderate- to high-risk noncardiac surgery that required arterial catheter insertion and mechanical ventilation. Clinicians chose a fluid strategy based on a desired 10%, 15%, or 20% increase in stroke volume (SV) in response to a fluid bolus. Dedicated fluid management software prompted "test" or "recommended" boluses, and clinicians were free to initiate a "user" bolus of 100 to 500 ml of crystalloid or colloid. Clinicians were free to accept or decline the software prompts. The authors primarily compared the fraction of software-recommended boluses that produced suitable increases in SV to a 30% reference rate. On an exploratory basis, we compared responses to software-recommended and clinician-initiated boluses.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-four of 479 (89%) software-recommended fluid boluses and 508 of 592 (86%) clinician-initiated fluid boluses were analyzed per protocol. Of those, 66% (95% CI, 62 to 70%) of delivered fluid boluses recommended by the software resulted in desired increases in SV, compared with the 30% reference rate, whereas only 41% (95% CI, 38 to 44%) of clinician-initiated boluses did (P < 0.0001). The mean ± SD increase in SV after boluses recommended by the software was 14.2 ± 13.9% versus 8.3 ± 12.1% (P < 0.0001) for those initiated by clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluid boluses recommended by the software resulted in desired SV increases more often, and with greater absolute SV increase, than clinician-initiated boluses. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness may help clinicians optimize intraoperative fluid management during noncardiac surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管过度或不足的液体管理会导致并发症,但在非心脏手术期间,液体管理的差异仍然很大。目标导向的管理有助于优化液体的输注量和时间,但由于算法复杂,实施起来很困难。因此,作者测试了 Acumen 辅助液体管理软件(美国爱德华生命科学公司)的性能,该软件旨在指导手术期间的最佳静脉输液。

方法

在这项多中心、前瞻性、单臂队列评估中,作者纳入了 330 名接受中度至高危非心脏手术的成年人,这些手术需要动脉导管插入和机械通气。临床医生根据对液体冲击后每搏量(SV)增加 10%、15%或 20%的目标,选择一种液体策略。专用的液体管理软件提示“测试”或“推荐”补液,临床医生可以自由地输入 100 至 500 毫升晶体或胶体的“用户”补液。临床医生可以自由地接受或拒绝软件提示。作者主要比较了软件推荐的补液量中有多少能使 SV 得到适当增加,与 30%的参考率进行比较。基于探索性目的,我们比较了对软件推荐和临床医生发起的补液的反应。

结果

按方案对 479 次软件推荐的液体冲击中的 424 次(89%)和 592 次临床医生发起的液体冲击中的 508 次(86%)进行了分析。其中,软件推荐的液体冲击中有 66%(95%置信区间,62%至 70%)导致 SV 增加,而 30%的参考率为 41%(95%置信区间,38%至 44%),与参考率相比,软件推荐的液体冲击效果更好(P < 0.0001)。与临床医生发起的冲击相比,软件推荐的冲击后 SV 的平均增加量为 14.2 ± 13.9%,而临床医生发起的冲击为 8.3 ± 12.1%(P < 0.0001)。

结论

与临床医生发起的冲击相比,软件推荐的冲击更频繁地导致所需的 SV 增加,并且 SV 的绝对增加量更大。对液体反应性的自动评估可能有助于临床医生在非心脏手术期间优化术中液体管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验