Rogers Lisa, MacCormac Aoife
University College Dublin, School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Systems, Ireland.
University College Dublin, School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Systems, Ireland.
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106573. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106573. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
While undergraduate education aims to provide student nurses with a level of competence for independent practice, criticisms exist surrounding the ability of these programmes to adequately prepare graduates for the clinical skills required to optimise care. Adopting virtual simulations into nursing curricula may support greater clinical preparedness due to the student-driven nature of this approach. However, learning is also cited as a social experience requiring teacher-student interaction. Therefore, a challenge exists to develop teaching strategies that balance interactive learning while also ensuring students achieve relevant competencies.
Using scenario-based learning in a blended environment, this research evaluates the impact of different teaching modalities (in-person vs virtual patient case simulations) on undergraduate student nurses' perceived learning gains and self-efficacy.
A pre and post-test design.
Eligible participants were Irish nursing students enrolled in a 5-credit European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) module (Autumn 2023 academic term) focusing on the care of persons with altered cardiovascular function at a large, urban university.
An online survey investigated the impact of these different teaching modalities on students' perceived learning and self-efficacy. Scales were adapted from previous research and non-parametric tests explored changes in perceptions over time. Thematic analysis of open-text responses provided greater insight into student experiences.
The response rate was 57 % (n = 97) at baseline and 23 % (n = 39) at follow up. Students' perceptions of their learning gains and self-efficacy were scored positively for both in-person and virtual scenario-based teaching modalities. However, following participation with virtual simulation, meaningful, positive improvements to students' understanding, attitudes, and self-efficacy were identified. Three key themes were generated from participants' open-ended survey responses which revealed the core features of both teaching modalities and students' desire to further integrate more virtual activities into undergraduate curricula: 1) In-person accessibility and interactivity matters: 2) Virtual simulations: bringing content to life: 3) Online learning: the path forward.
By combining the advantages of in-person and online learning platforms, a blended approach can close the theory to practice gap and support diverse student cohorts to succeed within nursing education.
本科教育旨在使护生具备独立执业的能力水平,但围绕这些课程能否充分让毕业生掌握优化护理所需临床技能存在批评意见。将虚拟模拟纳入护理课程可能有助于提高临床准备程度,因为这种方法具有以学生为导向的特点。然而,学习也被认为是一种需要师生互动的社会体验。因此,存在一个挑战,即要制定既能平衡互动式学习,又能确保学生获得相关能力的教学策略。
本研究在混合式环境中采用基于情景的学习,评估不同教学模式(面对面与虚拟患者案例模拟)对本科护生感知到的学习收获和自我效能的影响。
前后测试设计。
符合条件的参与者是爱尔兰护生,他们注册了一个5学分的欧洲学分转换系统(ECTS)模块(2023年秋季学期),该模块聚焦于一所大型城市大学中心血管功能改变患者的护理。
一项在线调查研究了这些不同教学模式对学生感知到的学习和自我效能的影响。量表改编自先前研究,非参数检验探讨了随着时间推移认知的变化。对开放式文本回答进行主题分析,能更深入了解学生的体验。
基线时回复率为57%(n = 97),随访时为23%(n = 39)。学生对面对面和基于虚拟情景的教学模式的学习收获和自我效能的认知评分均为积极。然而,参与虚拟模拟后,发现学生在理解、态度和自我效能方面有有意义的积极改善。从参与者的开放式调查回答中产生了三个关键主题,揭示了两种教学模式的核心特征以及学生希望将更多虚拟活动进一步整合到本科课程中的愿望:1)面对面的可及性和互动性很重要;2)虚拟模拟:让内容生动起来;3)在线学习:前进的道路。
通过结合面对面和在线学习平台的优势,混合式方法可以弥合理论与实践的差距,并支持不同学生群体在护理教育中取得成功。