Wyndaele J J, De Sy W A, Claessens H
Paraplegia. 1985 Feb;23(1):18-26. doi: 10.1038/sc.1985.4.
In a series of 115 spinal cord injury patients four different methods of bladder drainage were used mainly during spinal shock. That is a) suprapubic fine bore cystostomy, b), indwelling Foley catheter, c) intermittent catheterisation; and d) both last methods consecutively. The methods of bladder drainage used did not influence the number of patients becoming catheterfree but determined significantly the length of period before patients became catheterfree. Patients on intermittent catheterisation had the shortest time from injury to established micturition. Patients on intermittent catheterisation and on cystostomy had few complications but in those patients treated with an indwelling Foley catheter the complication rate was high.
在一系列115例脊髓损伤患者中,主要在脊髓休克期间使用了四种不同的膀胱引流方法。即a)耻骨上细孔膀胱造瘘术,b)留置Foley导尿管,c)间歇性导尿;以及d)连续使用后两种方法。所采用的膀胱引流方法并不影响患者不再需要导尿的人数,但显著决定了患者不再需要导尿之前的时间长度。接受间歇性导尿的患者从受伤到建立排尿的时间最短。接受间歇性导尿和膀胱造瘘术的患者并发症较少,但接受留置Foley导尿管治疗的患者并发症发生率较高。