Shu Li, Yuan Zhen, Lu Yi, Ma Shenghui, Liu Chunhui, Cai Zhejun
Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.
State Key Laboratory of Transvascular Implantation Devices, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-01992-2.
Slow activation areas, characterized by decreased conduction velocities in the left atrium, are commonly observed in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). However, it remains unclear whether the ablation of slow activation areas combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) improves clinical outcomes in these patients.
This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent catheter ablation for PeAF. A total of 78 consecutive patients were included in the PVI + SAA group, while another 78 patients who underwent PVI with/without the roof line, matched 1:1 by propensity score, served as the control group. Slow activation area was defined as ≥ 4 10 ms-step isochrones within 10 mm distance. The endpoint was AF recurrence, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (AT) lasting > 30 s after the blanking period.
The mean mapping time was 10 ± 3 min in the PVI + SAA group. Slow activation areas were identified in 37 of the 78 patients, predominantly located in the anterior wall and often overlapping with the low-voltage areas. The proportion of atrial arrhythmia-free patients was significantly higher in the PVI + SAA group compared to the PVI group (Log-rank P = 0.024; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.85). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in AT/AF recurrence rates between patients who underwent additional ablation of slow activation area and those without identified slow activation areas in the PVI + SAA group (Log-rank P = 0.73; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.42-3.42).
Slow activation areas can be efficiently identified using isochronal mapping. Targeted ablation of slow activation areas helps reduce AT/AF recurrence in patients with PeAF.
慢激活区域的特征是左心房传导速度降低,在持续性房颤(PeAF)患者中普遍存在。然而,慢激活区域消融联合肺静脉隔离(PVI)是否能改善这些患者的临床结局仍不明确。
这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了接受导管消融治疗PeAF的患者。PVI + SAA组共纳入78例连续患者,另外78例接受了有或无房顶线的PVI患者,根据倾向评分1:1匹配,作为对照组。慢激活区域定义为在10毫米距离内≥4个10毫秒步长的等时线。终点为空白期后持续>30秒的房颤复发、房扑或房性心动过速(AT)。
PVI + SAA组的平均标测时间为10±3分钟。78例患者中有37例发现慢激活区域,主要位于前壁,且常与低电压区域重叠。与PVI组相比,PVI + SAA组无房性心律失常患者的比例显著更高(对数秩检验P = 0.024;风险比[HR]:0.40;95%置信区间[CI]:0.19 - 0.85)。亚组分析显示,在PVI + SAA组中,接受额外慢激活区域消融的患者与未发现慢激活区域的患者之间,AT/AF复发率无显著差异(对数秩检验P = 0.73;HR:1.20;95% CI:0.42 - 3.42)。
使用等时标测可有效识别慢激活区域。对慢激活区域进行靶向消融有助于降低PeAF患者的AT/AF复发率。