低电压区消融治疗持续性心房颤动:一项随机对照试验。

Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Masuda Masaharu, Sunaga Akihiro, Tanaka Nobuaki, Watanabe Tetsuya, Minamiguchi Hitoshi, Egami Yasuyuki, Oka Takafumi, Minamisaka Tomoko, Kanda Takashi, Okada Masato, Kawasaki Masato, Matsuda Yasuhiro, Tanaka Koji, Yamada Tomomi, Hikoso Shungo, Dohi Tomoharu, Inoue Koichi, Sotomi Yohei, Sakata Yasushi

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

出版信息

Nat Med. 2025 May;31(5):1661-1667. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

Abstract

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53-68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42-57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

摘要

左心房的低电压区域(LVAs)可能会促进心房颤动(AF),但LVAs消融预防心律失常的疗效尚未确定。在本研究中,我们开展了一项多中心随机对照试验(SUPPRESS-AF),以研究LVAs消融对持续性AF且伴有左心房LVAs患者的疗效。持续性AF且在肺静脉隔离(PVI)后电压图上左心房LVAs覆盖左心房表面≥5 cm的患者,以1:1的比例随机接受LVAs消融(PVI + LVA-ABL组)或不接受消融(单纯PVI组)。使用24小时动态心电图(ECG)和每日两次的便携式ECG记录监测AF或房性心动过速(AT)的复发情况。主要终点是在1年随访期间无AF或AT复发且未使用抗心律失常药物。在1347例接受AF初次消融的患者(1003例男性和344例女性)中,伴有左心房LVAs的患者被分配至PVI + LVA-ABL组(n = 170)或单纯PVI组(n = 171)。尽管PVI + LVA-ABL组显示出AF或AT复发无事件率在数值上高于单纯PVI组(61%(95%置信区间(CI)= 53 - 68%)对50%(95% CI = 42 - 47%)),但这种差异未达到统计学意义(对数秩检验P = 0.127)。两组之间与手术相关的严重不良事件无差异(1.7%对1.8%,P < 0.0001)。总之,对于伴有左心房LVAs的持续性AF患者,除PVI外进行LVAs消融并不能显著降低1年AF或AT复发率。未来需要开展研究以确定可能从LVAs消融中获得更大益处的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3567/12092238/fb1b1c43b813/41591_2025_3674_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索