Risi Barbara, Imarisio Alberto, Cuconato Giada, Padovani Alessandro, Valente Enza Maria, Filosto Massimiliano
NeMO-Brescia Clinical Center for Neuromuscular Diseases, Brescia, Italy.
Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70014. doi: 10.1111/ene.70014.
Several studies evaluated peripheral and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) mtDNA as a putative biomarker in neurodegenerative diseases, often yielding inconsistent findings. We systematically reviewed the current evidence assessing blood and CSF mtDNA levels and variant burden in Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Multiple sclerosis (MS) was also included as a paradigm of chronic neuroinflammation-driven neurodegeneration.
Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for articles published from inception until October 2023. Studies focused on mtDNA haplogroups or hereditary pathogenic variants were excluded. Critical appraisal was performed using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria.
Fifty-nine original studies met our a priori-defined inclusion criteria. The majority of CSF-focused studies showed (i) decreased mtDNA levels in PD and AD; (ii) increased levels in MS compared to controls. No studies evaluated CSF mtDNA in ALS. Results focused on blood cell-free and intracellular mtDNA were contradictory, even within studies evaluating the same disease. This poor reproducibility is likely due to the lack of consideration of the many factors known to affect mtDNA levels. mtDNA damage and methylation levels were increased and reduced in patients compared to controls, respectively. A few studies investigated the correlation between mtDNA and disease severity, with conflicting results.
Additional well-designed studies are needed to evaluate CSF and blood mtDNA profiles as putative biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases. The identification of "mitochondrial subtypes" of disease may enable novel precision medicine strategies to counteract neurodegeneration.
多项研究评估了外周血和脑脊液(CSF)中的线粒体DNA(mtDNA)作为神经退行性疾病潜在生物标志物的情况,但结果往往不一致。我们系统回顾了当前评估帕金森病(PD)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)和肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者血液和脑脊液中mtDNA水平及变异负担的证据。多发性硬化症(MS)作为慢性神经炎症驱动的神经退行性疾病的范例也被纳入研究。
检索了Medline、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中从建库至2023年10月发表的文章。排除聚焦于mtDNA单倍群或遗传性致病变异的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估标准进行批判性评价。
59项原创性研究符合我们预先定义的纳入标准。大多数聚焦于脑脊液的研究表明:(i)帕金森病和阿尔茨海默病患者脑脊液中mtDNA水平降低;(ii)与对照组相比,多发性硬化症患者脑脊液中mtDNA水平升高。尚无研究评估肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者脑脊液中的mtDNA。即使在评估同一疾病的研究中,聚焦于无细胞血液和细胞内mtDNA的结果也相互矛盾。这种可重复性差可能是由于未考虑到许多已知会影响mtDNA水平的因素。与对照组相比,患者的mtDNA损伤水平升高,而甲基化水平降低。少数研究调查了mtDNA与疾病严重程度之间的相关性,但结果相互矛盾。
需要更多设计良好的研究来评估脑脊液和血液中的mtDNA谱作为神经退行性疾病潜在生物标志物的情况。确定疾病的“线粒体亚型”可能有助于制定新的精准医学策略来对抗神经退行性变。