Innate and SARS-CoV-2 specific adaptive immune response kinetic in neutralizing monoclonal antibody successfully treated COVID-19 patients.

The impact of anti-Spike monoclonal antibody (mAbs) treatment on the immune response of COVID19-patients is poorly explored. In particular, a comparison of the immunological influence of different therapeutic regimens has not yet been performed. Aim of the study was to compare the kinetic of innate and adaptive immune response as well as the SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and T cell response in two groups of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients treated with two different mAbs regimens: Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (BAM/ETE) or Casirivimab/Imdevimab (CAS/IMD). SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (n = 39) with mild/moderate disease were enrolled before (T0) and after 7 days (T7) and 30 day (T30) from mAbs infusion. Patients were divided in two groups on the basis of the mAb regimen: BAM/ETE (n = 15) and CAS/IMD (n = 24). The phenotype/function of immune cell subsets was evaluated by flow-cytometry and by ELISA. The Spike-specific T cell response (IFN-γ) and anti-Nucleocapside IgG were evaluated by chemiluminescence assay. SARS CoV-2 RNA in nasal swabs was evaluated by RT-PCR. Eleven out of the thirty-nine enrolled patients tested negative at T7, among which nine (81.8 %) had been treated with CAS/IMD regimen. A comparable increase in CD4 and CD8 T cells was observed in both treatment groups. Moreover, a reduction of CD38 expression on T (CD4, CD8 and Vδ2) and on NK cells was observed in both groups, as well as a reduction overtime of the perforin expression in T (CD8, Vδ2) and in NK cells reaching significance only in CAS/IMD-treated patients. The SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells response increased at T7 in BAM/ETE-treated patients and at T30 in CAS/IND group. Of note, at T30 SARS-CoV2-specific T cells was higher in CAS/IMD than in BAM/ETE group. Furthermore, the titre of anti-N IgG increased overtime in both groups with a faster kinetic in CAS/IMD group. The spontaneous production of inflammatory cytokines by monocytes and neutrophils was similar the two mAb regimens, as well as the level of plasmatic IL-6. Finally, patients were also analysed according to sex. The male group showed a higher frequency of activated CD4 T cells, NKG2A-expressing CD8 T cells and perforin-expressing Vδ2 T cells compared to female group. Moreover, a higher specific T cell response at T30 was observed in the male compared to female group. In conclusion, these results show similar effects of both mAb regimens in restoring T and NK cell homeostasis and in reducing inflammation. In contrast, CAS/IMD allows a better humoral and cellular SARS-CoV2 specific immunization.