Whiteley Nicole, Beech Brooke F, Schmitter-Edgecombe Maureen
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Dec;46(10):966-977. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2451315. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
Self-monitoring abilities, both in the moment (online) and general self-knowledge (offline) of one's errors, are crucial to implementing modification to tasks to support healthy, independent aging. Cognitive strategies (CS) aid in functional, physical, and cognitive abilities, but without recognition of their need, individuals may struggle to complete daily tasks. The current study examined whether higher levels of self-monitoring would predict higher use and quality of real-world cognitive strategies in older adults.
Participants included 80 community-dwelling midlife and older adults. Participants completed a remote battery of neuropsychological tasks, including a computerized go-no-go task that evaluated online self-monitoring, and a self-reported questionnaire to measure offline self-monitoring (Cognitive Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). To assess CS, a count score (CS Quantity) and utility score (CS Quality) were computed based on strategies utilized in completion of real-world prospective memory tasks.
Online self-monitoring was not significantly related to offline self-monitoring ((77) = -.07, = .52). A hierarchical regression revealed that while offline self-monitoring significantly predicted 7% of the variance in CS Quality, above and beyond age, global cognition, and premorbid functioning (Δ = .07, Δ = 6.23, = .02), the addition of online self-monitoring did not contribute significant incremental validity (Δ = .001, Δ = 0.12, = .73). The second hierarchical regression revealed that neither online nor offline self-monitoring significantly predicted CS Quantity, after controlling for sex (Δ = .004, Δ = 0.29, = .60).
The results support the distinction between online and offline self-monitoring concepts and their assessment. For community-dwelling midlife and older adults without dementia, clinicians may consider an individual's perceptions of their ability to self-monitor when working to facilitate the use of cognitive strategies.
即时(在线)自我监测能力以及对自身错误的一般自我认知(离线)能力,对于实施任务调整以支持健康、独立的衰老至关重要。认知策略(CS)有助于提升功能、身体和认知能力,但如果个体未意识到其必要性,可能在完成日常任务时面临困难。本研究旨在探讨更高水平的自我监测是否能预测老年人在现实世界中对认知策略的更高使用频率和质量。
研究对象包括80名居住在社区的中年及老年人。参与者完成了一系列远程神经心理学任务,其中包括一项评估在线自我监测的计算机化停止信号任务,以及一份用于测量离线自我监测的自我报告问卷(认知自我效能问卷)。为评估认知策略,根据在完成现实世界前瞻性记忆任务时所采用的策略计算出计数分数(CS数量)和效用分数(CS质量)。
在线自我监测与离线自我监测无显著相关性((77) = -.07, = .52)。分层回归分析显示,虽然离线自我监测能显著预测CS质量变异的7%,在控制年龄、整体认知和病前功能之外(Δ = .07, Δ = 6.23, = .02),但加入在线自我监测并未显著增加有效方差(Δ = .001, Δ = 0.12, = .73)。第二次分层回归分析显示,在控制性别后,在线和离线自我监测均未显著预测CS数量(Δ = .004, Δ = 0.29, = .60)。
研究结果支持在线和离线自我监测概念及其评估之间的区别。对于无痴呆症的社区居住中年及老年人,临床医生在努力促进认知策略使用时,可考虑个体对自我监测能力的认知。