Lan Tiancai, Liu Shoutang, Ye Yuanliang, Zhu Jiale, Wei Ruixiang, Wang Chuanming, Ma Guirong
Department of Neurosurgery, Liuzhou People's Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi Autonomous Region, China.
Engineering Technological Research Center for Nervous Anatomy and Related Clinical Applications, Liuzhou, Guangxi Autonomous Region, China, Department of Neurology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e36501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036501.
Endoscopic hematoma evacuation has become well received for its high evacuation rate in patients with intracerebral hematoma. Effective hemostatic procedure is the key to the success of the procedure. Any single method cannot solve all kinds of intraoperative bleeding, The key to hemostasis is to identify the type of bleeding and take the best hemostasis method during endoscopic surgery. In our study, sixty-two intracerebral hemorrhage patients who underwent endoscopic hematoma evacuations were analyzed. Intraoperative bleeding was graded as Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 based on characteristics of bleeding. A hemostatic strategy was created from the grading system. The efficiency was evaluated by operation time, evacuation rate, and re-bleeding rate after surgery. Procedure safety was evaluated by mortality rate and postoperative complications. We found that endoscopic removal of putamen hematoma was more prone to intraoperative bleeding (P = .00). Active bleeding occurred in early operative stage and errhysis happen in later stage (P = .00). Average evacuation rate was 95.61% and the mortality rate was 3.23%. The mean Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score at 6-month follow-up was 3.77 ± 1.12. No patient experienced postoperative re-bleeding. These findings indicated that most patients will experience different degrees of intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic hematoma evacuation. A hemostatic strategy based on intraoperative bleeding grade resulted in efficiency and safety.
内镜下血肿清除术因其对脑内血肿患者的高清除率而受到广泛欢迎。有效的止血程序是该手术成功的关键。任何单一方法都无法解决所有类型的术中出血,止血的关键在于识别出血类型并在内镜手术中采取最佳止血方法。在我们的研究中,分析了62例行内镜下血肿清除术的脑出血患者。根据出血特征将术中出血分为0级、1级、2级和3级。从分级系统制定了止血策略。通过手术时间、清除率和术后再出血率评估效率。通过死亡率和术后并发症评估手术安全性。我们发现内镜下壳核血肿清除术更容易发生术中出血(P = .00)。早期手术阶段出现活动性出血,后期出现渗血(P = .00)。平均清除率为95.61%,死亡率为3.23%。6个月随访时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)平均评分为3.77 ± 1.12。无患者术后发生再出血。这些发现表明,大多数患者在内镜下血肿清除术中会经历不同程度的术中出血。基于术中出血分级的止血策略提高了手术效率和安全性。