Knoppers Terese, Voutsinas Angelica, Palmour Nicole, Saulnier Kaleb, Holmes Morgan, Charron Marilou, Gallois Hortense, Jamali Narges, Ordal Leslie, Joly Yann
Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Tri-Agency Institutional Programs Secretariat, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 6;12:1436354. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436354. eCollection 2024.
This qualitative research study aimed to better understand and help improve the Canadian context for health communication with intersex adults by centering the voices of those directly involved and impacted.
We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with intersex individuals (14) and healthcare practitioners (HCPs, 8) from diverse areas of care. Interviews were analyzed via template thematic analysis and filtered through a conceptual lens that brought together agency-based and social-ecological models of health communication.
Findings produced three interlocking axes for change: HCP skills and approaches, structural access to care, and norms and discourses. Participant accounts depict a landscape for intersex health communication where practices are improving, but adverse experiences are still commonplace and intersex individuals cannot assume HCPs will be competent in intersex care. Rather, they utilize a variety of strategies and expend considerable efforts navigating structural gaps and barriers to access affirmative HCPs, who themselves often gained their expertise via individual initiative. Interviewees advocated for HCPs to get a baseline background in intersex care during their medical training, as well as skills in accessible health communication and person-centered and trauma-informed approaches. They also connected broader societal stigma and pathologization to harmful medical practices and called for naturalization and normalization of intersex variations.
This study highlights the need for collaborative efforts across multiple sectors and by multiple stakeholders to drive meaningful change. Findings can help guide HCPs, medical educators, researchers, advocates, and policymakers towards accessible, affirmative, and agency-based care.
这项定性研究旨在通过聚焦直接参与和受影响者的声音,更好地理解并帮助改善加拿大与双性人成年人进行健康沟通的环境。
我们对来自不同护理领域的双性人个体(14名)和医疗保健从业者(8名)进行了22次半结构化访谈。通过模板主题分析对访谈进行分析,并通过一个概念框架进行筛选,该框架融合了基于能动性和社会生态的健康传播模型。
研究结果产生了三个相互关联的变革轴:医疗保健从业者的技能和方法、获得护理的结构途径以及规范和话语。参与者的叙述描绘了双性人健康沟通的现状,即实践正在改善,但不良经历仍然很常见,双性人个体不能假定医疗保健从业者有能力提供双性人护理。相反,他们采用各种策略,并付出相当大的努力来跨越结构上的差距和障碍,以找到能够提供肯定性护理的医疗保健从业者,而这些从业者自己往往是通过个人主动性获得专业知识的。受访者主张医疗保健从业者在医学培训期间获得双性人护理的基线背景知识,以及具备易于理解的健康沟通技能、以患者为中心和了解创伤的方法。他们还将更广泛的社会耻辱感和病态化与有害的医疗实践联系起来,并呼吁使双性人变异自然化和正常化。
本研究强调了多个部门和多个利益相关者需要共同努力以推动有意义的变革。研究结果可以帮助指导医疗保健从业者、医学教育工作者、研究人员、倡导者和政策制定者实现易于获得、肯定性和基于能动性的护理。