Leigh Chloe, Gill Jodie, Razak Zainab, Shreyan Shirsho, Cadilhac Dominique A, Kim Joosup, Lannin Natasha A, Dennis Martin, Kapral Moira, Pandian Jeyaraj, Hardianto Yudi, Lin Beilei, Meretoja Atte, Aziz Noor Azah Abd, Schwamm Lee, Norrving Bo, Thapa Lekhjung, Dozier Marshall, Kelavkar Shyam, Mead Gillian
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rajshahi Medical College, Laxmipur Rajpara, Bangladesh.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jan 21:23969873241311821. doi: 10.1177/23969873241311821.
National stroke clinical quality registries/audits support improvements in stroke care. In a 2016 systematic review, 28 registries were identified. Since 2016 there have been important advances in stroke care, including the development of thrombectomy services. Therefore, we sought to understand whether registries have evolved with these advances in care. The aim of this systematic review was to identify current, hospital-based national stroke registries/audits and describe variables (processes, outcome), methods, funding and governance).
We searched four databases (21st May 2015 to 1st February 2024), grey literature and stroke organisations' websites. Initially two reviewers screened each citation; when agreement was satisfactory, one of four reviewers screened each citation. The same process was applied to full texts. If there were no new publications from registries identified in the original 2016 review, we contacted the registry leads. We extracted data using predefined categories on country (including income level), clinical/process variables, methods, funding and governance.
We found 37 registries from 31 countries (28 high income, four upper-middle income, five lower-middle income) of which 16 had been identified in 2016 and 21 were new. Twenty-two of the same variables were collected by >50% of registries/audits (mostly acute care, including thrombectomy, and secondary prevention), compared with only four variables in 2016. Descriptions of funding, management, methods of consent and data privacy, follow-up, feedback to hospitals, linkage to other datasets and alignment of variables with guidelines were variably reported. Reasons for apparent termination of some registries was unclear.
The total number of stroke registries has increased since 2016, and the number of variables collected has increased, reflecting advances in stroke care. However, some registries appeared to have ceased; the reasons are unclear.
国家卒中临床质量登记处/审核有助于改善卒中护理。在2016年的一项系统评价中,共识别出28个登记处。自2016年以来,卒中护理取得了重大进展,包括血栓切除术服务的发展。因此,我们试图了解登记处是否随着这些护理进展而发展。本系统评价的目的是识别当前基于医院的国家卒中登记处/审核,并描述变量(过程、结果)、方法、资金和治理情况。
我们检索了四个数据库(2015年5月21日至2024年2月1日)、灰色文献以及卒中组织的网站。最初由两名评审员筛选每篇文献;当一致性令人满意时,由四名评审员中的一名筛选每篇文献。全文采用相同的流程。如果在2016年的原始评价中未识别出登记处的新出版物,我们会联系登记处负责人。我们使用预定义的类别提取有关国家(包括收入水平)、临床/过程变量、方法、资金和治理的数据。
我们从31个国家(28个高收入国家、4个中高收入国家、5个中低收入国家)找到了37个登记处,其中16个在2016年已被识别,21个是新的。超过50%的登记处/审核收集了22个相同的变量(主要是急性护理,包括血栓切除术和二级预防),而2016年只有4个变量。关于资金、管理、同意方法和数据隐私、随访、向医院反馈、与其他数据集的关联以及变量与指南的一致性的描述报告不一。一些登记处明显终止的原因尚不清楚。
自2016年以来,卒中登记处的总数有所增加,收集的变量数量也有所增加,这反映了卒中护理的进展。然而,一些登记处似乎已经停止;原因尚不清楚。