• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography.临终关怀机构中的谵妄预防:机遇与局限——一项聚焦人种志研究
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):391-400. doi: 10.1177/02692163241310762. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
'It's tough. It is hard': A qualitative interview study of staff and volunteers caring for hospice in-patients with delirium.“这很艰难。非常艰难”:一项针对照护患有谵妄的临终关怀住院患者的员工和志愿者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;37(7):993-1005. doi: 10.1177/02692163231170655. Epub 2023 May 2.
3
Delirium as letting go: An ethnographic analysis of hospice care and family moral experience.谵妄即释怀:临终关怀与家庭道德体验的民族志分析
Palliat Med. 2015 Dec;29(10):959-66. doi: 10.1177/0269216315580742. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.从姑息治疗和临终关怀环境中进行眼捐献:EDiPPPP 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(20):1-159. doi: 10.3310/KJWA6741.
5
The difficulties of discharging hospice patients to care homes at the end of life: A focus group study.终末期将 Hospice 患者转至养老院的困难:一项焦点小组研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;32(7):1267-1274. doi: 10.1177/0269216318772735. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
6
"Beyond Feasibility": A Qualitative Study of Patients, Their Whānau (Family) and Staff Perspectives and Experiences of a Non- Pharmacological Delirium-Prevention Intervention in Two Aotearoa/New Zealand Hospices.“超越可行性”:对奥塔哥/新西兰两家临终关怀机构的患者、他们的亲属(家庭)和工作人员对非药物性谵妄预防干预的看法和体验的定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Apr;67(4):327-336.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): protocol for a co-design and feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care.改善临终关怀机构中谵妄的检测、评估、管理和预防(DAMPen-D 研究):一项针对实施策略的协同设计和可行性研究的方案,旨在提供符合指南的谵妄护理。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e060450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060450.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
The experience of delirium in palliative care settings for patients, family, clinicians and volunteers: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.在姑息治疗环境中,患者、家属、临床医生和志愿者的谵妄体验:定性系统评价和主题综合分析。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;35(6):988-1004. doi: 10.1177/02692163211006313. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
Terminal Delirium in Hospice: The Experiences and Perspectives of Caregivers Providing Care to Terminally Ill Patients in Home Settings.临终关怀中的终末期谵妄:在家中为绝症患者提供护理的照顾者的经历与观点
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jan;39(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/10499091211000729. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
'It's tough. It is hard': A qualitative interview study of staff and volunteers caring for hospice in-patients with delirium.“这很艰难。非常艰难”:一项针对照护患有谵妄的临终关怀住院患者的员工和志愿者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;37(7):993-1005. doi: 10.1177/02692163231170655. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Stakeholder perspectives of a pilot multicomponent delirium prevention intervention for adult patients with advanced cancer in palliative care units: A behaviour change theory-based qualitative study.利益相关者对姑息治疗病房中晚期癌症成人患者进行多组分谵妄预防干预的试点的看法:基于行为改变理论的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Sep;36(8):1273-1284. doi: 10.1177/02692163221113163. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Improving the Detection, Assessment, Management and Prevention of Delirium in Hospices (the DAMPen-D study): protocol for a co-design and feasibility study of a flexible and scalable implementation strategy to deliver guideline-adherent delirium care.改善临终关怀机构中谵妄的检测、评估、管理和预防(DAMPen-D 研究):一项针对实施策略的协同设计和可行性研究的方案,旨在提供符合指南的谵妄护理。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e060450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060450.
4
Translating qualitative data into intervention content using the Theoretical Domains Framework and stakeholder co-design: a worked example from a study of cervical screening attendance in older women.使用理论领域框架和利益相关者共同设计将定性数据转化为干预内容:来自一项关于老年女性宫颈癌筛查参与度研究的实例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 6;22(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07926-2.
5
Risk factors for delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受专科姑息治疗的成年患者发生谵妄的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Feb;36(2):254-267. doi: 10.1177/02692163211065278. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
The experience of delirium in palliative care settings for patients, family, clinicians and volunteers: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.在姑息治疗环境中,患者、家属、临床医生和志愿者的谵妄体验:定性系统评价和主题综合分析。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;35(6):988-1004. doi: 10.1177/02692163211006313. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Patterns of behaviour in nursing staff actioning the afferent limb of the rapid response system (RRS): A focused ethnography.护理人员在执行快速反应系统(RRS)传入环节时的行为模式:一项聚焦民族志研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3548-3562. doi: 10.1111/jan.14551. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Development of an online tool for linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action based on triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus.基于文献综合和专家共识研究结果的三角测量,开发一种将行为改变技术与作用机制相联系的在线工具。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1049-1065. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa050.
9
Non-Pharmacologic Multicomponent Interventions Preventing Delirium in Hospitalized People.非药物多组分干预措施预防住院患者谵妄。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1864-1871. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16565. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
A Multicomponent Nonpharmacological Intervention to Prevent Delirium for Hospitalized People with Advanced Cancer: A Phase II Cluster Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial (The PRESERVE Pilot Study).多组分非药物干预预防晚期癌症住院患者谵妄的研究:一项 II 期集群随机对照试验(PRESERVE 预试验研究)。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Oct;23(10):1314-1322. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0632. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

临终关怀机构中的谵妄预防:机遇与局限——一项聚焦人种志研究

Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography.

作者信息

Featherstone Imogen, Johnson Miriam J, Sheldon Trevor, Kelley Rachael, Hawkins Rebecca, Bravington Alison, Callin Sarah, Dixon Rachael, Obita George, Siddiqi Najma

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):391-400. doi: 10.1177/02692163241310762. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1177/02692163241310762
PMID:39835463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common and distressing for hospice in-patients. Hospital-based research shows delirium may be prevented by targeting its risk factors. Many preventative strategies address patients' fundamental care needs. However, there is little research regarding how interventions need to be tailored to the in-patient hospice setting.

AIM

To explore the behaviours of hospice in-patient staff in relation to delirium prevention, and the influences that shape these behaviours.

DESIGN

Focused ethnography supported by behaviour change theory. Observation, semi-structured interviews and document review were conducted.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 89 participants (multidisciplinary staff, volunteers, patients and relatives) at two UK in-patient hospice units.

RESULTS

Hospice clinicians engaged in many behaviours associated with prevention of delirium as part of person-centred fundamental care, without delirium prevention as an explicit aim. Carrying out essential care tasks was highly valued and supported by adequate staffing levels, multidisciplinary team engagement and role clarity. Patients' reduced physical capability limited some delirium prevention behaviours, as did clinicians' behavioural norms related to prioritising patient comfort. Delirium prevention was not embedded into routine assessment and care decision-making, despite its potential to reduce patient distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The value placed on fundamental care in hospices supports delirium prevention behaviours but these require adaptation as patients become closer to death. There is a need to increase clinicians' understanding of the potential for delirium prevention to reduce patient distress during illness progression; to support inclusion of delirium prevention in making decisions about care; and to embed routine review of delirium risk factors in practice.

摘要

背景

谵妄在临终关怀住院患者中很常见且令人痛苦。基于医院的研究表明,针对谵妄的危险因素可预防谵妄。许多预防策略都涉及患者的基本护理需求。然而,关于如何根据住院临终关怀环境调整干预措施的研究很少。

目的

探讨临终关怀住院工作人员在预防谵妄方面的行为,以及影响这些行为的因素。

设计

以行为改变理论为支撑的聚焦人种学研究。进行了观察、半结构化访谈和文件审查。

地点/参与者:英国两家住院临终关怀机构的89名参与者(多学科工作人员、志愿者、患者及亲属)。

结果

临终关怀临床医生在以患者为中心的基本护理中采取了许多与预防谵妄相关的行为,但预防谵妄并非明确目标。执行基本护理任务受到高度重视,充足的人员配备、多学科团队参与和角色明确对此起到了支持作用。患者身体能力下降限制了一些预防谵妄的行为,临床医生将患者舒适度置于优先地位的行为规范也有同样的限制作用。尽管预防谵妄有可能减轻患者痛苦,但它并未纳入常规评估和护理决策中。

结论

临终关怀机构对基本护理的重视支持了预防谵妄的行为,但随着患者临近死亡,这些行为需要做出调整。有必要提高临床医生对预防谵妄在疾病进展过程中减轻患者痛苦的潜力的认识;支持在护理决策中纳入预防谵妄的内容;并在实践中对谵妄危险因素进行常规审查。