• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Inferior outcome of stand-alone short versus long tibial stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective comparative study with minimum 2 year follow-up.

作者信息

Abdelatif Elsayed Ahmed, Abu Mukh Assala, Elsaid Ahmed Nady Saleh, Youssef Ahmed Omar, Foissey Constant, Servien Elvire, Lustig Sebastien

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, 69004 Lyon, France - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, 61519 Minia, Egypt.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sport Medicine, Croix-Rousse Hospital, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, 69004 Lyon, France - Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

SICOT J. 2025;11:3. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024054. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024054
PMID:39835707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11748526/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (RTKA) is complex, and induced bone loss might endanger implant fixation and joint stability. Intramedullary stems improve fixation throughout stress redistribution. The current study aims to compare the performance of short tibial stems with long tibial stems, investigating their intermediate-term radiographic and survival outcomes in RTKA. The main hypothesis is that the two types of tibial stems would exhibit similar complication and revision rates in mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RTKA for all causes in a specialized arthroplasty center from 2010 to 2022 with minimum 2-year follow-up were included in this study. Patients receiving mega prosthesis or implants associated with sleeves or cones were excluded. The final groups consisted of 234 knees: 110 patients with short stems (SS) and 124 with long stems (LS). The mean age at surgery was 65.96 ± 8.73 years in SS and 67.07 ± 8.64 years in LS. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 28.95 is SS and 30.88 in LS (p < 0.05). The average follow-up for SS group was 4.24 years and for LS 5.16 years (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Complications and re-revisions did not differ significantly between two groups (p > 0.05). Pathological radiolucency was present in 20.91% in SS group and 33.87% in LS group (p < 0.02). Time-to-re-revision was shorter in SS group and occurred at a mean of 3.1 years, while LS failed at a mean of 5.1 years (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SS and LS may be comparable in terms of complications and re-revision. SS significantly fails almost 2 years earlier than long stem (p < 0.001). Additionally, there is a higher tendency for re-revision due to loosening in patients who present pathological radiolucency in SS group. To obtain the benefits of short stem and improve the longevity of the construct; adjuvant zone II (metaphyseal) fixation might be the clue.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/7ae41120dd37/sicotj-11-3-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/0c2f74bc192e/sicotj-11-3-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/0ac63c9c225a/sicotj-11-3-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/b0154f70924d/sicotj-11-3-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/7ae41120dd37/sicotj-11-3-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/0c2f74bc192e/sicotj-11-3-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/0ac63c9c225a/sicotj-11-3-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/b0154f70924d/sicotj-11-3-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e95b/11748526/7ae41120dd37/sicotj-11-3-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Inferior outcome of stand-alone short versus long tibial stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective comparative study with minimum 2 year follow-up.
SICOT J. 2025;11:3. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024054. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.胫骨干骺端圆锥结合短柄在翻修全膝关节置换术中的表现与长柄一样好。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):2254-2260. doi: 10.1111/ans.17864. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.小梁金属骨水泥加强型股骨柄结合短柄假体在全膝关节翻修中获得良好疗效。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.058. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.新型干骺端多孔钛锥体在全膝关节置换翻修术中可带来良好的效果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1537-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04645-5. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
5
Outcomes of Short and Long Tibial Stems for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Population of Obese Patients at Two-Year Follow-Up: A Clinical and Biomechanical Study.在为期两年的随访中,肥胖患者中初次全膝关节置换术短胫骨柄和长胫骨柄的结果:一项临床和生物力学研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S174-S182. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.047. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
6
Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss.使用锥形和套管进行干骺端固定治疗严重胫骨近端骨缺损。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S256-S262. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.062. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
7
Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.在严重骨缺损的翻修膝关节置换术中,钽金属杯的中期至长期效果良好。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5496-5506. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
Cementless, Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional Instrumentation: Technical Pearls and Intraoperative Considerations.使用传统器械的非骨水泥型、保留交叉韧带初次全膝关节置换术:技术要点与术中注意事项
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Sep 13;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00036. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
9
Impact of Metaphyseal Sleeves and Porous Cones on Risk Reduction for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Aseptic Re-Revision in a United States Integrated Health Care System.干骺端套筒和多孔锥体对全膝关节置换翻修风险降低的影响:美国综合医疗保健系统中的无菌再翻修
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Sep;40(9):2375-2380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.050. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
10
High Survivorship of Short-Cemented Femoral Stems in Condylar Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Significant Metaphyseal Bone Loss: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.短水泥固定股骨柄在髁间翻修全膝关节置换术中具有较高的生存率,且无明显的干骺端骨丢失:至少 5 年随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Oct;36(10):3543-3550. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.036. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中短柄和长柄骨干骺端圆锥体的短期生存率和功能结果比较。
J Knee Surg. 2024 Sep;37(11):765-772. doi: 10.1055/a-2315-7778. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
2
Tibial tubercule osteotomy during the revision of total knee arthroplasty: The technique of a referral center with 10 years of experience.全膝关节置换翻修术中的胫骨结节截骨术:一家拥有10年经验的转诊中心的技术
SICOT J. 2023;9:18. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2023016. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees.
在全膝关节置换翻修手术中,我们需要使用偏距柄的频率是多少?关于连续789例膝关节的研究。
SICOT J. 2023;9:15. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2023012. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Novel metaphyseal porous titanium cones allow favorable outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty.新型干骺端多孔钛锥体在全膝关节置换翻修术中可带来良好的效果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1537-1547. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04645-5. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
5
Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.小梁金属骨水泥加强型股骨柄结合短柄假体在全膝关节翻修中获得良好疗效。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):657-663. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.058. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030.2014 年至 2030 年美国初次全关节置换术预估量。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617.
7
Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes.确定PECO:一个用于提出好问题以探究环境及其他暴露因素与健康结果之间关联的框架。
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):1027-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Imaging After Total Knee Arthroplasty.美国放射学会全膝关节置换术后影像检查适宜性标准
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S421-S448. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.036.
9
Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management.翻修全膝关节置换术中的骨丢失:评估与处理
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 May;25(5):348-357. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00660.
10
Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中的柄长度
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):407-12. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9297-4.