• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重视减少美国枪支暴力的益处。

Valuing the benefits of reducing firearm violence in the United States.

作者信息

Cook Philip J, Jeuland Marc, Ludwig Jens

机构信息

Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2419864122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2419864122. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2419864122
PMID:39835906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11789060/
Abstract

Justifying a proposed government regulation intended to reduce firearm violence requires a conceptually sound estimate of the monetized value of that impact and how that value is distributed across the population. Some previous estimates do not serve as a valid basis for policy evaluation or are out of date. A nationally representative survey was conducted by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in August 2022 (n = 660). The authors designed and added a series of contingent-valuation items to the questionnaire. Double-bounded estimates of willingness-to-pay (WTP) were derived from a regression analysis of responses regarding voting on a hypothetical referendum on a state-wide package of measures designed to reduce gun violence at specified cost to taxpayers. Average WTP for a reduction of 20% in the state rate of gun violence was $744 per household (IQR:$668-$928), implying a national total of $97.6 billion. Household WTP was positively associated with household income, the respondent's assessment of the seriousness of gun violence in their community and the subjective likelihood that they would become a victim of gun violence. A variety of tests support the claim that this application of the contingent-valuation method provided valid results. WTP is the recognized basis for assessing the value of proposed federal regulations. The estimated WTP for reducing gun violence is about twice as high as a recent cost-of-injury estimate and provides a much different picture of the incidence of costs by income and demographic characteristics.

摘要

要证明一项旨在减少枪支暴力的政府法规提案合理,需要对该影响的货币化价值及其在人群中的分布方式进行概念上合理的估计。一些先前的估计不能作为政策评估的有效依据,或者已经过时。2022年8月,美联社-全国民意研究中心公共事务研究中心进行了一项具有全国代表性的调查(n = 660)。作者在问卷中设计并添加了一系列条件估值项目。支付意愿(WTP)的双边界估计值来自对关于在一项旨在以特定成本降低枪支暴力的全州范围措施包的假设全民公投上投票的回复进行的回归分析。枪支暴力发生率降低20%时,每户的平均支付意愿为744美元(四分位距:668美元至928美元),这意味着全国总计976亿美元。家庭支付意愿与家庭收入、受访者对其社区枪支暴力严重程度的评估以及他们成为枪支暴力受害者的主观可能性呈正相关。各种测试支持了这样的说法,即这种条件估值方法的应用提供了有效的结果。支付意愿是评估拟议联邦法规价值的公认依据。减少枪支暴力的估计支付意愿约为最近伤害成本估计值的两倍,并提供了一幅关于成本按收入和人口特征分布情况的截然不同的图景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/10e53f798ca7/pnas.2419864122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/e2ca8e95746e/pnas.2419864122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/82784db6057a/pnas.2419864122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/10e53f798ca7/pnas.2419864122fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/e2ca8e95746e/pnas.2419864122fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/82784db6057a/pnas.2419864122fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e85/11789060/10e53f798ca7/pnas.2419864122fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Valuing the benefits of reducing firearm violence in the United States.重视减少美国枪支暴力的益处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2419864122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2419864122. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
7
Impact of a clinician-directed educational program on communicating with patients regarding gun violence at two community urban healthcare centers.一项由临床医生主导的教育项目对两家城市社区医疗中心就枪支暴力问题与患者沟通的影响。
J Osteopath Med. 2025 Jan 29;125(7):359-368. doi: 10.1515/jom-2024-0245. eCollection 2025 Jul 1.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Gun Free Zones in Alcohol-Serving Establishments and Risk for Firearm Violence: A Cross-Sectional, Geospatial Study in Texas.提供酒精饮料场所的无枪区与枪支暴力风险:德克萨斯州的一项横断面地理空间研究
J Urban Health. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00928-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting and Preventing Gun Violence: An Experimental Evaluation of READI Chicago.预测与预防枪支暴力:对芝加哥“READY”计划的实验性评估
Q J Econ. 2024 Feb;139(1):1-56. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjad031. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
2
Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in the U.S., 2019 and 2020.2019 年和 2020 年美国致命和非致命枪支伤害的成本。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Feb;66(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.026. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Regulating Assault Weapons and Large-Capacity Magazines for Ammunition.规范攻击性武器和大容量弹药弹匣。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1191-1192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17120.
4
Valuing the economic consequences of work injury and illness: a comparison of methods and findings.评估工伤和疾病的经济后果:方法与结果的比较
Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):418-37. doi: 10.1002/ajim.1114.